|
Hitler’s Christianity vs. the Illuminati: Was Hitler Undermined by ‘Black Nazis’?
Many people are familiar with Karl Marx’s infamous Communist Manifesto, however, few people are familiar with the antithesis to the Manifesto written by Karl Ritter, a wealthy, influential international banker. He joined a group who donned themselves the Grand Orient Freemasonry in 1733, and committed himself—as well as the entire lodge—to establishing a “totalitarian dictatorship based on their theories of atheistic dialectical and historical materialism” [Carr, Pawns in the Game 5].
Ritter claimed that the majority, if not all, of the international bankers were of Jewish [ethnic] descent [which was probably true], regardless of whether or not they practiced Judaism. Ritter asserted, in his antithesis, that there would be immense danger in the future if these Jewish men continued to control and direct international Communist policies. Hence, he allegedly offered the German-Aryan Nazi War Lords tangible suggestions for defeating these money-barons. He advised them as to how they might go about obtaining complete control of the world’s resources for myriad Aryan races [Ibid.].
Carr alleges that these men were the only ‘Nazis’, and that they were solely responsible for “genocidal policies”—i.e., mass shootings of Jews, etc.—during Hitler’s reign. In fact, Carr claims that Hitler’s National Socialism was not even necessarily Fascism; that Hitler’s whole movement was subtly undermined by ‘Black Nazis’ who were working not for Hitler, but rather, for the Illuminists inspired by Ritter. Also, this ‘Black’ Nazism was supposedly the reason as to why Franco would not support Germany. He believed that the Nazi War Lords had taken control and would not align himself with that incarnation of evil. He believed that Hitler had lost control of his government [153].
Allegedly, there were “Nazi War Lords” who actually tried to kill Hitler, at least during the first assassination attempt, because he was far too lenient, and subject to peaceful resolutions [149]. These Nazi War Lords were determined to wage total war for the Illuminist-Aryan cause that willed to end Jewish-Communist worldwide tyranny via “extermination” [Carr 153-156]. They felt that Hitler had to go, because he was not willing to wage this total war, but above all, because he zealously opposed their inane Aryan philosophy [151-52]. What is most interesting is Carr’s presumption that the Russian government was secretly arming the Nazi War Lords. I suppose this is possible, as the American government is known to have sold arms to the Soviet Union, who in turn sold arms to Ho Chi Minh to use against our own soldiers during the Vietnam War [see Stanley Karnow’s Vietnam].
The Nazi War Lords complained to Hitler, alleging that the Catholic and Protestant clergy were defying the state’s authority by breaking the laws. “Hitler, in order to maintain a united front against Communism, tried to pacify the Nazis by issuing an edict that any clergyman preaching against the laws of the state, or questioning its supremacy, would be subjected to the full process of the law and, if found guilty, would suffer the penalties provided for such ‘crimes.’” He “tried to pacify the clergy by banning the Grand Orient Lodges which were known to be the headquarters of the Aryan extremists throughout Germany.” The Nazi leaders sidestepped this legislation by renaming themselves and regrouping as the “Orders of German Chivalry” [152]. Thus it was, that “the forces of evil [insinuating Satan] divided two powerful forces [the clergyman and Black Nazis] which were both combating a common enemy” [Soviet Communism] [Ibid]. Carr argues that Hitler was essentially a powerless pawn in the midst of evil, who served as a figurehead who represented the interests and wishes of the German people, but who was ultimately stripped of his power because of his constant mediation and leniency.
The ludicrous Aryan State principle was attributed to Hitler by the Illuminists, hence the anti-Fascist press throughout the world “cried to high heaven that Hitler was a pagan, and a black-shirted totalitarian-minded Nazi War Lord” [152]. Carr gives this as the reason for the subsequent war between the clergy and the state. “What happened in Germany in 1936 has happened in other countries since. The leaders of ‘Black Nazism’ joined forces with the leaders of ‘Red’ Communism in an attack on both the Christian religion and the British Empire” [Ibid].
Ritter’s Long Range Plan consisted firstly with the objective of subjugation of Europe under Germany. Secondly, he recommended a financial policy that would render international bankers powerless over the economies of much of Europe. Thirdly, he proposed “an organization of a Nazi Fifth Column to counteract the Communist Underground organization” [6]. The goal of this program was to get the average people to believe that Fascism was the only feasible resistance to Communism. Lastly, Ritter suggested the total annihilation of Communism via extermination of the Jewish race [163]. He believed this to be an absolute essential if the Aryan races were to completely throw off the yoke of the Jewish bankers, who were utilizing Communism for their own greed-ridden ends [Ibid.]. Indeed, Ritter was one of the many scholars who believed in the fruition and destiny of the German Master Race, as once pondered by Friedrich Nietzsche (who by the way is also alleged to have had Illuminist ties) [157]. Ritter went so far as to claim that Aryans were The Master Race on the earth [6].
Carr goes on to claim that, “World War II was started in order to enable the Illuminati to finally rid themselves of the barriers of caste and creed and prejudice. Their ideas regarding a new civilization had to be built through a world at war” [156]. He begins by stating that the Axis powers, with special emphasis accorded to Hitler for his “independent financial policy and monetary reforms” [164]—had brought the wrath of the international bankers upon themselves, because they had refused to submit to the ‘internationalist monetary system.’ From 1930 onwards, numerous Britons tried in vain to stave off involvement in another world war, however, they were instead ruthlessly attacked by the anti-Fascist agencies who donned them “black totalitarian-minded Nazis’ [Ibid.]. Some of these Communist-opposing Britons openly commended Hitler and Franco, as they favored the Fascist principles that these two men, in particular, ardently espoused. Sir Oswald Mosley came to the forefront of this group of outspoken and valiant Fascist Britons [Ibid].
Carr brings up the fact that the public, as well as he himself, was told that Hitler did not keep his word. Carr says, “The public was told after his “Putsch” into Sudetenland, that Hitler had said, he ‘intended to make no further demands.’ It was made to appear in the press that the German note to Poland suggesting a “peaceful” solution to the problems created by the Treaty of Versailles was ‘another demand,’ and therefore, ‘a broken promise’” [Ibid.]. Well, Carr explains that this is absolutely untrue, because Hitler specifically announced that he “would make no further demands AFTER he had rectified the injustices inflicted upon the German people by those who had dictated the terms and conditions incorporated into the Treaty of Versailles” [emphasis original]. This just goes to show how a half-truth has far greater implications than an outright lie. Carr goes on to state, “Hitler’s promise was qualified. He promised he would make no further demands after the problems involving Sudetenland, part of Czechoslovakia, the Polish Corridor and Danzig, had been solved” [Ibid.]. But, why did Hitler insist on these “demands”?
The German nation had been rendered absolutely powerless upon the surrender of the First World War. The Treaty of Versailles had removed East Prussia from the rest of Germany. The purely German city of Danzig was completely isolated, and the Germans who had remained in the region had been relentlessly and brutally persecuted. The Austrian citizens—living in the soon-to-be region of Czechoslovakia—wished more than anything to return to Germany, and they were outspoken about this desire. In fact, the majority of the people shed tears of joy upon Hitler’s entry into both Austria and the region which came to be known as Czechoslovakia. However, the Austrians’ desires for unification, in order to stave off Communism, fell upon deaf ears [164]. Upon exposing oneself to this most damning “treaty” that also demanded irrational and insurmountable reparations payments from the German Volk, it is very easy to see why Hitler sought the “demands” he did.
The fact if the matter is, Hitler’s “demands” were not very demanding at all. First of all, the international conspirators had fooled Mr. Chamberlain into signing the guarantee that Britain would come to the aid of Poland if Germany sought aggression against her, by presenting to him a false report “to the effect that a 48-hour ultimatum had been delivered by Germany to the Poles” [164]. The German government never issued a 48-hour ultimatum. Instead, the note called for peaceful and reasonable demands—which Field Marshall Keitel, and others, deemed overly lenient—of the Poles with regards to Danzig and the Polish Corridor. [The Memoirs of Field-Marshal Wilhelm Keitel, 91, and Carr 164]. Naturally, this extreme leniency and wish to avoid war was intolerable to the “Black Nazi pagan War Lords”, and the Illuminati, so with “diabolical intrigue the nations of the world were being lined up for World War Two. The Russian dictatorship was secretly re-arming the German armies. The Italian dictatorship, under Mussolini, was secretly building a huge navy of submarines to German specification and design. These submarines were tested out under conditions of actual warfare during the Spanish Civil War.” These tests had proved that the German subs were far superior to anything England had in 1936, and the British government was notified of this matter [153-54].
Hitler had regretfully antagonized the international bankers by announcing his sweeping monetary reforms, as well as his financial policy. He was able to convince Italy, Japan, and Spain to follow suit in an effort to oppose the international “Cartels and Monopolies financed and controlled by the international bankers, particularly their ‘Brain-Child,’ the Bank of International Settlements” [154]. This did not bode well with the international bankers who had implemented twenty-six international banks since the end of the Great War [WWI]. These banks were nearly identical to the Federal Reserve Bank, which has heavily indebted the United States. “Against this process of reducing the people of the world to financial slavery Hitler decided to take a definite stand, and he refused to allow Germany to be merged into the League of Monopolist States, secretly controlled by agents of the Illuminati” [154-55].
Even Roosevelt may have been a pawn of these Illuminists, as “he found he [too] couldn’t break, or even curb, the power of the Illuminati. He [too] was forced to lead his country into war against the only countries who held firm to the very policy he had so rashly announced soon after he was elected to office” [155].
The question really boils down to: Why was Hitler undermined by these ‘Black Nazis’? Carr states:
While Hitler suffered imprisonment prior to 1934 because he was considered the personal enemy of the Nazi War Lords and the international bankers, he wrote Mein Kampf. On the very last page he stated: ‘The party (National-Socialist) as such stands for positive Christianity but does not bind itself in the matter or creed to any profession. It combats the Jewish materialistic spirit within and without us.’ In 1933 Hitler also announced his policy in regard to Britain. He pointed out that Marx, Lenin, and Stalin had all repeatedly reiterated that before international Communism could reach its final objectives, Britain and her empire had to be destroyed. Under these circumstances Hitler said: ‘I am willing to help defend the British empire by force if called upon.’ Of the Treaty of Versailles Hitler wrote: ‘It was not a British interest (intention) but, in the first place, a Jewish one to destroy Germany.’ [In fact, numerous Jews were involved in the drawing up and implementation of the Treaty.] He also wrote: ‘Even in England there is a continual struggle going on between the representatives of British States’ interests and the Jewish World Dictatorship. Whilst England is exhausting herself in maintaining her position in the world, the Jew today is a rebel in England and the struggle against the Jewish world menace will be started there also.’ Hitler never wavered from his personal opinion that the survival of Germany as a great power depended upon an alliance with the British Empire” [emphasis added] [148].
Carr argues that Hitler’s failure to obtain an alliance with Britain made him feel less favorable towards moderate policy, as it had convinced him that moderate policy was not enough to withstand the immense power that the international bankers had over British foreign policy. As a matter of fact, Carr claims that Hitler’s earnest desire to share the future with England—even if it required him to cede more world power and influence to England than to his own country—put him in utterly staunch opposition to the Long Range Plan of the Ritterian Nazi War Lords [148].
Hitler was said to have stated that he would continually oppose the totalitarian extremist plans of the Nazi War Lords, and that he would confine his military activities to Europe in an effort to eradicate Communism, provided the British government enter into an alliance with Germany. Lord Londonderry informed him that this would be highly unlikely. So, Hitler compromised, and asked for a peace pact between the two countries “for ten years.” He emphasized the collective need to repudiate accrued debts to international banks; that Britain, France, Russia, and Germany “restore the issuing of money to the government where it originally and rightfully belonged.” Indeed, Hitler is said to have pointed out that his National Socialist movement aimed primarily at ending, for all time, the worldwide power of the international money-lenders [149].
Hitler had failed to bring about the necessary alliance with Britain, while inadvertently earning the enmity of the Nazi War Lords, who advocated totalitarianism and the destruction of Christianity. “They did not want an alliance with Britain. They did not want Christianity to flourish.” Moreover, they despised Hitler’s preventive measures, which the anti-Fascist press was repeatedly denouncing as “acts of aggression” on Hitler’s part. Hitler always maintained that these maneuvers were strictly preventive, and that he only made military moves in order to prevent Stalin’s further establishing his sphere of influence “on or about the 40th parallel of latitude in Europe.” Carr claims that the Black Nazi War Lords did not approve of Hitler’s hindering with their plans of total war that would embroil Russia, Britain and France in a full-scale war of Aryan world conquest. They demanded Hitler take offensive action and when he did not follow suit, they attempted to liquidate him [151]. Carr even alleges that Heβ was one of those duped by the War Lords, and that is why Hitler had no idea whatsoever of his plan to negotiate with England [167-68]. The secret ‘Heβ meeting’ is supposed to have taken place in May of 1941 [167]. After this had occurred, the conniving Nazi War Lords convinced Hitler that if he did not move against Stalin, then Stalin would most certainly act to the peril of all. “On June 22, 1941 German forces invaded Russia” [167].
Hitler plead with Lord Londonderry to advocate a peace pact between Germany and Britain, and he stated, “I am convinced that the British Empire and the Roman Catholic Church are both universal institutions, the continuance of which is absolutely essential as bulwarks for the preservation of law and order throughout the world in the future.” He reminded Lord Londonderry that millions of Christians had been ruthlessly slaughtered in the many Communist countries since October, 1917. He argued that the men responsible for this onslaught could not have been anything other than international gangsters. During that same meeting Göring is said to have reviewed the role that the international bankers had had in the Russian revolution of 1917, which had enabled them to bring about the adverse conditions “being experienced throughout the world at that time” [150].
In closing, Carr has argued in an impelling way, that Hitler’s downfall, and possibly also the downfall of Roosevelt, was due to the direct work of Satan via the Illuminati. Though most of this entire thesis would be difficult to maintain when put to the test of scholastic rigor, it nevertheless argues—albeit from a minority and abstruse Christian point-of-view—that Hitler was actively fighting for God against Satan, both within and without, his country. It is a very intriguing book with loads of interesting information, and I would recommend it even though it is not well-documented. It is worth reading simply because it is so thought-provoking, and it will not fail to fully engage your mind.
|