|
Hitler on Christianity and Jewry: Why His Interpretations and Beliefs Are True and Correct
Hitler: Jews in Religious History
… To begin with, this realization created what today we call the laws of ethics, which allowed the concepts of right and wrong, morality and custom, to grow out of the necessity of mutual consideration. But for all these laws, the meaning of existence remained the same. Though no man’s mind is conscious of it, worked in him instinctively—that is, the duty toward the earth, the fundamental idea. But because as such it did not rise to consciousness even among the lawgivers, a Moses—or a Confucius or the founder of the Buddhist religion, or Christ or Mohammed—moved away from viewing these ethical laws as the link to the earth, and postulated a new otherworldly link for the inward experience of this Logos, this urge; they established a ‘religio,’ they set ‘God’ in place of the unconscious urge. That is why St. John, that great Christian philosopher, continues, ‘And the Logos was with God, and the Logos was God [Wagener, p. 315].
Hitler believed that religion was, in essence, the structured attempt—erected and instituted by mankind—to explain his (man’s) natural instinct for self-preservation. Most people believe that religion only serves as an explanation, either of man’s essence or, as an explanation for man’s existence on earth. Hitler took this precept a step further, in that he believed religion to be man’s explanation for his own natural instincts; in other words, man’s “urge” to fulfill his earthly obligations of self-preservation, as well as, his instinctual desire to perpetuate his own race [p. 314]. Hitler believed that the Jew, being naturally of the devil, interfered with this natural instinct, by filling natural men’s heads with self-destructive concepts, such as: liberalism, egalitarianism, altruism, atheism, democracy, liberty, fraternity, equality, communism and bolshevism. He believed that all of these precepts would lead all the races of men who had subscribed to any one of them down the path of self-destruction. He constantly raised the issue that Jewry, as a race, had chosen to be unnatural; to destroy the natural, godly order of things that every other race of men had joyfully and willfully accepted, and aspired to. He presents a compelling argument to Wagener, which basically indicts the Jews as the scourge of all men, no matter their race.
Furthermore, Hitler had ascribed to the belief that God was not only to be found in nature—transcendentalism—but more importantly, within man, himself. He said, “… they set ‘God’ in the place of the unconscious urge.” Well, Hitler has made it quite clear that he had believed that “urge” to be the fulfillment of the transferring, of what he called “earth-electricity,” from one form of life to the next. In other words: ‘God’ willed the fulfillment of each individual’s earthly obligations, which above all, translated to the preservation of each man’s own race, as God had created them. This makes sense if we are to subscribe to the biblical belief that God created man in his own image. If God is indeed perfect, as the Bible states to be true, then each race of men must be perfect; but, for Hitler, this meant only as God had made them, not as self-made—or, man-made—mongrels. Even Christ had believed this to be the truth, as he had said, “All men are equal in the sight of God” [p. 315].
Jews as the “Destroyers” of Racial Purity
Hitler believed that African men, Asian men, Aryan men, etc., were all made perfect, by God, in the beginning [Wagener, p. 143; Hitler, Hitler’s Letters and Notes, p. 279-83]. It is very difficult to say, for sure, whether or not Hitler also believed the Jews to be made perfect in the beginning, though, it appears that he did indeed believe that Jews too, were perfect at one time; but, they had willingly chosen the path of the devil, which is the path of death, chaos, and destruction, and had subsequently willed this same demise for the rest of mankind. If we are to go with Hitler’s belief that Jewry’s very nature was destruction, then we may be able to suppose that Hitler believed that they wanted to take the rest of mankind to the grave with them for fear of being alone, or for some other unbeknownst reason. Hitler does not really tell us any more, other than the fact that Jews cannot help themselves; as their will had appeared to him to be one of utter destruction [Wagener, p. 61-65]. So, if Hitler did not really have any ideas as to why Jewry ascribed to this will of destruction, then we probably will not be able to offer up any explanatory ideas either. Although, Hitler did believe that Jewry was the only parasitic race in the world, and he believed that they preyed on every race of men, encouraging them to intermix and hate one another [p. 63]. He cited the case of the Jewish-led Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, and the subsequent coerced—and oftentimes, forced—intermixing of the many races therein, as an example. This gross experiment and blood-letting campaign was the last thing that he wanted to have happen to Western Europe.
In fact, he told Wagener, “The whole Bolshevik Revolution seems like the struggle in Lenin’s blood: the struggle between the Asiatic [Jewish] will to destruction and the European will to culture” [p. 143]. Hitler believed that mongrelization was original sin; and that it had been instigated and perpetuated by Jews—especially throughout the Aryan-Western societies of the world [Wagener, p. 282].
Jewry: The Parasitic Race
‘Whoever possesses more in the way of worldly goods has greater responsibilities toward his fellowman [meaning racial kinsman]. No one is what he is on his own merits, but only through the grace of God!’ Christ was intent on returning religion to the natural urge, the Logos, the true obligation [which was self-preservation]. But what developed in the name of Christianity was a perversion of the Christian idea, its misrepresentation to the point of its exact opposite, and the recurrence and the renewed consolidation of the ‘superiors’ the ‘masters.’ Put in political terms, it was ‘reactionary’ [p. 316].
Hitler is alluding heavily to Nietzschean philosophy here, but more importantly, he is also referring directly to the case of Russia—in essence. Hitler believed the “perversion” of true Christ-Christianity to be no less reactionary than Bolshevism, and no different from communism. That is why he had stated, during a conversation with Martin Bormann that “Originally, Christianity was an incarnation of Bolshevism the destroyer.” That is exactly what he had believed Christ had set out to change.
Many people are under the impression that Christ was the originator of Christianity, but that simply is not true. Christianity preceded Christ; you may want to recall the fact that Jesus was baptized. There was already a religious ideological foundation in place when Christ arrived, but it had been nearly eradicated by Jewry and the priest class, and it was not yet referred to as “Christianity.” Jesus made it his personal mission, which he believed to have been ordained of God, to expose the crimes of the priest class and Jewry, in order to usher in a true Christianity. Remember, too, that Jesus fulfilled the role of the prophesied Christ; so, the concept of the Christ was imparted unto Jesus—the man—in order to fulfill the prophesied making of a new religion. This new proto-socialist religion, which came to be called “Christianity,” was named so only after Jesus had assumed the role of the Christ.
Hitler went on to say:
“Since that time, we have seen a constant shifting back and forth between reaction [Bolshevism-Communism] and true teaching of Christ [religio-socialism], between the will of the upper classes to subjugate and the revolt of the masses, which is aroused and constantly replenished by an inkling that is perhaps only intuitive but may possibly also arise from an instinctive recognition of the true cosmic context” [p. 316].
Hitler constantly associated Bolshevist-Communism with godlessness, reactionaries, Jews and Satan; whereas, he associated National Socialism with the “true teachings of Christ,” positive [“real,” as per Dr. Cajus Fabricius] Christianity, godliness, a “religio”-inspired socialism, and God. Many Nazi-Sozis, especially Hitler, even referred to Christ as: “the true God,” the God of the Europeans, the first socialist, “the greatest anti-Semite of all time,” and the linchpin of our history. According to Steigmann-Gall, author of The Holy Reich, Joseph Goebbels referred to himself as a “Christ-Socialist.”
Hitler: On Christ’s Legacy
It is hard to say what exactly Hitler had believed to be absolute truth, as opposed to mysticism, with regards to Jesus Christ, but he does describe for us at least a few of his beliefs. Hitler, in all probability, did not believe that Jesus literally rose from the dead, but rather, that his teachings had been brought back to life through his followers; namely, Hitler himself, and his fellow Nazi-Sozis. This becomes an issue of contention amongst Christians, because the Bible calls for the adherence to the belief that Jesus rose to new life. Well, the Bible neglects to define this in absolute terms. It could mean the resurrection of Christ’s body, spirit, or teachings; or, it could mean the resurrection of all three. The Bible is not clear on this point, so we are free to interpret it as we please. Secondly, Hitler did believe that Christ had been resurrected, in essence, via his socialist teachings. So, the debate is over as far as this issue is concerned.
Moving along, Hitler believed that Jesus’ body had been physically removed from the tomb to prevent his followers from worshipping it as a “tangible relic,” which in all likelihood, they would have done. However, he did refer to Jesus as “the Christ” and, as “the great new founder of a religion” [p. 316]! So, Hitler did believe in the religio-conception of “the Christ,” as per biblical prophecy. Furthermore, he has informed us that he greatly admired the Christian religion established by Jesus. In fact, on more than one occasion, Hitler had boasted, or claimed, to have done something in Jesus’ name, which, according to the Bible, is all that is required of a good, solid Christian believer. Jesus only asked that his followers believe in him and do good works for their fellowmen in his name. That is exactly what Hitler had believed and done for the entire continent of Europe.
Hitler never refers to Jesus as the literal ‘Son of God’ in his conversations with Wagener or Bormann, although, he does lean that way in his dialogue with Dietrich Eckart. Eckart himself believed in the divinity of Jesus; and Hitler loved Eckart. Furthermore, according to author Steigmann-Gall, Hitler had acknowledged the divinity of Jesus on a few documented occasions, so, whether or not he believed Jesus to be literally divine or not, we will probably never know for sure. He had said, “… whom posterity goes so far as to call the ‘son of God,’… [p. 316]. Unfortunately, this passage does not give us any insight, because Hitler is simply stating a fact; so, we do not know, from the way he uses it here, whether or not he actually believes this to be true or not. He simply makes a statement from which we cannot possibly make any definitive conclusions in this regard.
What is most ironic is the fact that Hitler’s Christianness is what ultimately led to his downfall, as he had tried to be kind to Jewry and make peace with the devil-led Allies. Christians tend to overcompensate with too much kindness and it always ends up being their own undoing. Jesus was crucified for his love and kindness; Hitler’s downfall and subsequent suicide was the result of his love and kindness; countless Romans were hurled out of power, or murdered for their kindness, whereupon they had freed their slaves and treated them as well as citizens.
Perhaps Christians need to read the Bible more closely, because through St. John, Jesus claims that when he returns, he will come with sword, to bring war and division. This is pointed up in the Gospels and in the Book of Revelation.
The Gospels report in graphic detail the expropriations, forced labor, two years or more of prison, and even death penalties that were inflicted in order to exterminate the plague of true Christianity. The Roman Occupation forces aided in this effort. And a major re-education program was initiated to reconvert—or rather, force to reconvert—those who might have gravitated to Christ or were vacillating [p. 316].
In this remark, we can clearly discern Hitler’s condemnation of these hideous and inhumane actions that were taken against Christians. In fact, he seems to be indicting the Romans in this regard. In another conversation, Hitler points out the fact that the “Roman-Christian” world persecuted and murdered women and children, because it had been subverted and subsequently corrupted by Jewry. Indeed, as pointed out by Dietrich Eckart, in Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin, several “Catholic” Popes throughout history had been Jewish, or part-Jewish, which is quite astonishing.
The Wickedness and Treachery of St. Paul
Though, Hitler did not fail to indict the Jew, St. Paul, as well, in this regard:
The apostle Paul himself relates that at one time he headed such a special court and imprisoned or tortured to death the poor victims, who had committed no other crime than giving their faith and their hope to this God-sent man, whom posterity goes so far as to call ‘the son of God,’ until Paul himself began to suspect, and then to realize, that the truth was not with the forces of reaction, but with the socialist teachings of Christ! He himself was therefore thrown into prison and handed over to the Roman slaves acquired in war.
Subsequently, as we have learned, in Rome the reaction continued in the persecution of Christians and the extermination of the socialists! But even later, when Christ’s movement took on ever greater proportions, the forces of reaction even appropriated his name and, as previously mentioned, reversed and corrupted his teachings and turned them into their own tool [p. 316]!
As evidenced in this passage, Hitler subtly condemns the Catholic-Roman world for allowing itself to be deceived into the mass-murder and mass-persecution of socialists, who, in Hitler’s opinion, had done absolutely nothing wrong. All they had done was adhered to the teachings of their hero and savior, Jesus Christ. This irrational and hate-filled campaign wielded by the Catholic-Roman world against the Christians can be equated to the inhuman and murderous persecution of the Germans, who had followed their Heiland, Adolf Hitler. Innocent followers had been hanged, tortured, “re-educated,” and terribly persecuted—and still are, in many cases—for being the followers of Adolf Hitler. There is absolutely no difference, and if anyone attempts to argue otherwise, he or she is probably a Jew, an Israeli apologist, or an anti-Gentilite.
Moreover, Hitler, like Jesus before him, had done everything in his power to make peace with Jewry and the priest class, but to no avail. Both were liquidated; both murdered at the instigation of Jewry. Let us put this into ratio format, shall we?
WWII Allies : Jews and Roman-Catholics :: The Nazi-Sozis : The Christian Followers of Christ
Moving right along, Hitler also brings up his belief that St. Paul had only “played sides,” and exposed him for the Jewish fraud he was. Paul never changed; only he changed sides. Whichever side seemed to be the side that would uphold the power-structure of Jewry, and the greed-ridden order would be the side that the Jews would cling to. What’s more, Hitler went on to equate the “forces of the reaction” and “reactionaries,” with the Bolsheviks and communists of his day. He believed that these reactionaries may have meant well, but were quickly deceived and subdued once Jewry took the reins and assumed control. That is exactly what had happened to Hitler’s next-door neighbors in Russia.
Jews as the Only Parasitic Race
During the Middle Ages, a new movement of inner liberation and the establishment of the natural link of man to his God began, which fell back on the true teachings of Christ and the instinctive apprehension [a feeling of anxiety or fear that something bad or unpleasant will happen, Microsoft Thesaurus] of the truth.”
In other words, people had to be afraid of the truth, because the “authorities” did not want the populace to seek, or know the truth. And, just as Holocaust “deniers” are threatened by Holocaust “believers” and Jews, so too were the European peasants threatened by Jews and the priests of the so-called “Christian Churches.” This is similar to the attack on Christians today; as we are seeing the Jews and their ACLU/ADL Hate Empire openly attack Christians and the New Testament, denouncing the tract as “anti-Semitic,” and its followers as “anti-Semites.” This is no different than the “Christian Churches” who had labeled true Christians as “heretics.” This gave the “Churches” the right to oppress and mass-murder people. Is this a possible goal of Jewry today? I have a feeling that that is indeed where they would like to take us, and we do have reason to be very weary of allowing Jews to consolidate too much power. In fact, they really ought to be sent to Madagascar, or dispersed throughout the world, as Hitler had willed, and forced to work like other races of men. No one deserves to live off of the labor and backs of others, no matter how rich, or special, they may believe themselves to be. Jewry needs to have some of its power taken away because, clearly, as seen in the Middle East, they are not responsible enough, or mature enough to handle it.
Hitler went on to say:
The reaction was not long in coming. The Inquisition and the witch-hunts rooted out all aspects of the heresy, as the hypocritical priesthood called it. In this way, all the Germanic people, who were the upholders of the idea of rebellion, were wiped out in Spain, Italy, France, and the southern Netherlands. Those who were able to escape sought help and asylum in England… A divinely inspired woman on the English throne, Queen Elizabeth, preserved her land from spiritual enslavement. A thirty-years-long war [The Thirty Years’ War] ravaged poor Germany. Only a fourth of the population survived this period of genocide. … By means of lies and forgeries, the history books—always controlled by the church and the secular powers—try to gloss over these incidents of terrible cruelty and brutality and to cloak them in a mantle of Christian love. But they were nothing other than criminal genocide. History kept particular silence about the fact that, precisely in the church, Jewry played a special role in this struggle of the oppressors against the desire for freedom of the enslaved, the violators against the violated, the parasites against purity and self-esteem [pp. 316-17]. [Emphasis added]
This passage is one of the most telling about Hitler’s true feelings regarding Jewry; he probably really did hate them. He wanted reckoning for their genocide campaigns against his people and his land, which is perfectly comprehensible. He just wanted them to “get the hell out.” Is that too much to ask?
I personally think that Hitler was incredibly kind-hearted when it came to his dealings with, and treatment of Jews in the Reich, and for Jewry to pretend as though the Germans relentlessly persecuted them is to lie about history. That is why they have resorted to incarceration, terror, threats, and murder, in some cases. They have to keep the truth suppressed, because if it does leak out, Jewry as a whole may have “hell to pay” for advocating and perpetuating such lies. Though, they really have nothing to worry about, as we Europeans and Westerners do not hold our younger generations accountable for the crimes of our parents and ancestors, as the Jews do. This is just one of the ludicrous beliefs of Jews that can be found in the absurd Book of Genesis, which attempts to portray God as this vengeful creep who holds all of mankind accountable for the alleged foolhardiness of the first woman. Fairy tales are nice to read, but you are not supposed to actually believe them. Genesis is a symbolic story, of Jewish origin, that explains why all Jews, since the beginning of time, is the cursed people. They made their covenant with the devil, so naturally they reap what he sows. God did not curse them, they chose to curse themselves.
Jews as Truly Evil
Getting back to the passage, notice how Hitler regards Queen Elizabeth as a “divinely inspired woman.” I think that this reference alone should show you how Hitler equated a people’s Fatherland, religion, and leadership with their God. In other words, he probably believed her to have been “divinely inspired,” only because she had protected the spiritual—and perhaps, too, racial—sovereignty of her own people; her race. According to Hitler, this was the highest law of God, and for a person to do otherwise, was to strike a blow to the face of God himself. He discusses this precept in Mein Kampf on several occasions.
Furthermore, Hitler uses the term genocide or, a term in German that is equitable to the English term. This is quite interesting, only in that it tells us that he condemned this sort of inhumanity, and in all likelihood, never would have advocated such a treacherous policy.
In fact, ironically, Jewry is the one race that has actually repeatedly advocated, and carried out, genocide; against many different races of people. The Old Testament is riddled with genocidal accounts at the hands of Jews, and according to Hitler and others, Jews played a crucial role in the German genocide of the Thirty Years’ War. Furthermore, they are presently committing genocide against the Arabs in Palestine; and, upon witnessing their latest bombings and war-mongering wickedness, would probably like to commit genocide against all the peoples of the entire Middle East.
You do not need to read Mein Kampf to encounter evil… you need to read the Old Testament, and the Talmud, instead.
References
Bormann, M. (2000). Hitler’s Table-Talk 1941-1944: His Private Conversations. (H. Trevor-Roper, Ed.). (N. Cameron & R.H. Stevens, Trans.). New York City: Enigma Books.
Hitler, A. (1976). Hitler’s Letters and Notes. (W. Maser, Ed.). (A. Pomerans, Trans.). New York: Bantam Books.
Steigmann-Gall, R. (2003). The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, 1919-1945. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Wagener, O. (1985). Hitler—Memoirs of a Confidant. (H. Ashby Turner, Jr. Ed.). (R. Hein, Trans.). London: Yale University Press.
|