|
Hitler’s Notes: A Closer Examination of His Views of Jewry and “Democracies”
Hitler’s Notes: On Jewry
Hitler wrote, “A new state has arisen within the state-The Jew-the race without roots—and throughout the world. Jahve [Yahweh] the eternal Jewish aim.—World rule. Why did the Jew never have his own state” (Hitler, Hitler’s Letters and Notes, 1976, p. 221)?
As evidenced in this passage, we can clearly see that Hitler believed the term Jahve—or Yahweh—to literally be the embodiment of Jewish thought and action. Hitler did not believe that Yahweh was the Jewish God—but rather, the Golden Calf—nor the “Father” of Jesus Christ, but rather, the pursuit of “world rule.” Now, as I have stated in earlier pieces, Hitler believed the Jews to be the instigators and perpetuators of race-mixing, which he believed was a Jewish tool as a means to an end. That end was clearly “world rule.” Let me clarify this belief of his, so that it is more comprehensible.
Hitler, like many others, believed that miscegenation was the true original sin. Now, if that is the case, then man has indeed been sinning since the Beginning, if we are to believe—as Hitler had—that the Bible is “the monumental history of mankind.” The Jewish people, as per the Old Testament, had allegedly actively “betrayed Yahweh” by intermixing with other races of people, as evidenced by Ezra and others. Hitler had believed that the Jewish people had done this intentionally, but cloaked both their intentional miscegenation and avarice, with the “religious” canon of the Torah. Now, before you accuse Hitler’s views as absurd, ponder the facts for a moment.
The Jewish people have always migrated to foreign lands, and have displayed no marked aversion to taking foreign wives. Why are they so willing to disobey Yahweh’s “commands,” if they are truly concerned about following his commands? The bottom line is this: no foreigners wanted Jews in their lands, which has been documented by such notable figures as George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Voltaire, Thomas Jefferson, Jesus Christ, Adolf Hitler, Pharaoh, William Sherman, and Ulysses Grant. The Jews have had to cunningly and quietly immigrate into these foreign lands, defying the warnings of the leaders, by joining popular movements. The most modern movement, which Dr. MacDonald has addressed in his book Culture of Critique, is communism. But even liberalism—the so-called Left—might suffice. By winning the empathy and sympathy of these foreigners, they have been able to cleverly get them to espouse their views—and sometimes even the Jewish ethos.
Hitler had not so much disagreed with this premise, so much as he had loathed the Jews perpetuating their own agendas and views, upon an easily manipulated and trusting populace—oftentimes, to the detriment of that populace. He faulted the Aryan race, in particular, for being especially prone to Jewish subversion and deception, which is the main reason he believed that they had to be removed from Europe. Hitler certainly was not the only one who felt this vehemently about Jewry, as notable Americans and Christians espoused these same views.
Other Great Leaders’ Views of Jewry
[William Tecumseh] Sherman himself did not accept that “each man is as good as another.” As far back as the year 1862, Sherman had stated that the United States was “swarming with dishonest Jews” [see Michael Fellman, Citizen Sherman, p. 153]. He urged Ulysses Grant, to purge all Jews from his army. As Fellman writes, “On 17 December 1862, Grant . . . , like a medieval monarch . . . expelled ‘The Jews, as a class,’ from his department.” Fellman goes on to say that to Sherman, the Jews were “like niggers” and “like greasers [Mexicans] or Indians”… that they were “classes or races permanently inferior to his own.”
Martin Luther had said:
“I had made up my mind to write no more either about the Jews or against them. But since I learned that these miserable and accursed people do not cease to lure to themselves even us, that is, the Christians, I have published this little book, so that I might be found among those who opposed such poisonous activities of the Jews who warned the Christians to be on their guard against them. I would not have believed that a Christian could be duped by the Jews into taking their exile and wretchedness upon himself. However, the devil is the god of the world, and wherever God's Word is absent he has an easy task, not only with the weak but also with the strong. May God help us. Amen.
“He did not call them Abraham's children, but a 'brood of vipers' [Matt. 3:7]. Oh, that was too insulting for the noble blood and race of Israel, and they declared, 'He has a demon' [Matt 11:18]. Our Lord calls them a 'brood of vipers'; furthermore in John 8 [:39,44] he states: 'If you were Abraham's children ye would do what Abraham did…You are of your father the devil.' It was intolerable to them to hear that they were not Abraham's but the devil's children, nor can they bear to hear this today.
“They are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have not only perverted and falsified the entire Scriptures from beginning to end and without ceasing with their interpretations. And all of the anxious sighing, longing and hoping of their hearts is directed to the time when some day they would like to deal with us heathen as they dealt with the heathen in Persia at the time of Esther…” (Luther, The Jews and their Lies).
Now, these virulent passages were written by the same man who had previously heaped praises upon Jewry. In his earlier—what Hitler referred to as un-enlightened days—he spoke of the Jews as the “blood-relations of our Lord” and he even placed himself on the same plane with Jewry. The following excerpt from the Medieval Sourcebook should be sufficient evidence proving this to be the case.
“At the beginning of his career it is often said that Luther was apparently sympathetic to Jewish resistance to the Catholic Church. He wrote, early in his career:
The Jews are blood-relations of our Lord; if it were proper to boast of flesh and blood, the Jews belong more to Christ than we. I beg, therefore, my dear Papist, if you become tired of abusing me as a heretic, that you begin to revile me as a Jew.
“However, sometime before 1517, in his Letters to Spalatin, we can already see that Luther's hatred of Jews, best seen in his 1543 letter, was not some affectation of old age, but was present very early on. Luther expected Jews to convert to his purified Christianity. When they did not, he turned violently against them” (Halsall, 1997).
Hitler’s Lexicon and Luther’s Lexicon
Let us very briefly compare the lexicons of Hitler and Luther to solidify this point, as Hitler had believed—just like Luther—that he was doing “the work of God” by steadfastly defending himself, and his people, against Jewry.
Hitler said:
“Hence today I believe I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord” (Hitler, Mein Kampf).
“Was there any form of filth or shamelessness, particularly in cultural life, without at least one Jew involved in it? If you cut even cautiously into such an abscess, you found—like a maggot in a rotting body often dazzled by the sudden light—a little Jew.
“The mightiest counterpart to the Aryan is represented by the Jew” (Adolf the Great, n.d.).
Luther said:
“I wish and I ask that our rulers who have Jewish subjects exercise a sharp mercy toward these wretched people, as suggested above, to see whether this might not help (though it is doubtful). They must act like a good physician who, when gangrene has set in, proceeds without mercy to cut, saw, and burn flesh, veins, bone, and marrow. Such a procedure must also be followed in this instance. Burn down their synagogues, forbid all that I enumerated earlier, force them to work, and deal harshly with them, as Moses did in the wilderness, slaying three thousand lest the whole people perish. They surely do not know what they are doing; moreover, as people possessed, they do not wish to know it, hear it, or learn it. There it would be wrong to be merciful and confirm them in their conduct. If this does not help we must drive them out like mad dogs, so that we do not become partakers of their abominable blasphemy and all their other vices and thus merit God's wrath and be damned with them. I have done my duty. Now let everyone see to his. I am exonerated.
“My essay, I hope, will furnish a Christian (who in any case has no desire to become a Jew) with enough material not only to defend himself against the blind, venomous Jews, but also to become the foe of the Jews' malice, lying, and cursing, and to understand not only that their belief is false but that they are surely possessed by all devils. May Christ, our dear Lord, convert them mercifully and preserve us steadfastly and immovably in the knowledge of him, which is eternal life” (Halsall, 1997).
Clearly, these two men shared nearly identical views regarding Jewry.
Hitler identified a few different kinds of Jews in his notes. He wrote:
The humble Jew (humble—modest and unassuming attitude and behavior) The officious Jew (officious—characteristic of somebody who is eager to give unwanted help or advice) The impertinent Jew— (impertinent—showing a bold or rude lack of respect, especially to a superior) The domineering Jew— (domineering—showing a desire or tendency to exercise excessive control or authority over others) (Microsoft Thesaurus)
The most notable of the domineering Jews, which Hitler had really become fearful of, were Lenin and Stalin. In a conversation with Hans Baur, his pilot, Hitler had remarked that Stalin “was a beast in human form.” He had a great, and justifiable, fear of the Soviet Union using a few of the Slavic countries bordering Germany to the east as springboards into Germany proper. Hitler preempted Stalin, but had he been a man of lesser morality or foresight, more than likely, Germany would be equitable to the Russia of today—though, with an even more decimated population. It is also possible that the German race would have been exterminated in what would have been as great a genocide as the Ukrainian genocide at the hands of Stalin’s willing Jewish executioners. In fact, Theodore Kaufman’s Germany Must Perish! was taken very seriously by Hitler and Göbbels, and they made sure that this tract advocating Germanocide was translated into German and distributed en masse throughout Germany. If the leader of Al Qaeda wrote a tract advocating for the genocide and mass sterilization of Americans, would Americans take it seriously? Case closed.
A few examples of impertinent Jews probably would have included: Chaim Weizmann, Israel Zangwill (who coined the phrase “The Melting Pot,” and called America “his [the Jew’s] own land”), Walter Rathenau, and Kurt Eisner, who were both elitist political criminals.
Hitler also wrote:
“The Jew and Work—Egoism (philosophy making personal welfare and interests your primary or only concern, sometimes at the expense of others)—Socialism (a political theory or system in which the means of production and distribution are controlled by the people and operated according to equity and fairness rather than market principles)—Mammonism (wealth and riches considered as an evil and corrupt influence)” (Letters and Notes, p. 221).
He went on to write:
“penetration of the nations. Harmless at first. Attempt to influence public opinion; (the Jew as benefactor) Through press—literature—art; Destruction of natural strength through
1. Sapping morality 2. Destruction of honesty 3. Religion The Jew as doctor 5. The Jew as judge and lawyer
Coins money—hoards gold—Slow throttling of the peoples (throttling-to kill or injure a person or animal by squeezing the throat; to prevent somebody or something from expressing an opinion freely or from engaging in an activity); The nations start resisting; He flatters and bribes the princes.
“Resistance by the best minds and leaders of the people. The Jew is found out” (p. 223).
“democracy=majority decision=Public opinion=Press=Capital=Jew
German democracy means persuading the majority with reason.
Indeed, Joachim Fest said, “Hitler never wanted to establish a tyranny.” He used the spoken word, and his incredible oratory skills, coupled with his keen mind, to educate the German people; thus, winning them to his side with reason. Unlike Stalin, Lenin, or even Mao, Hitler did not have to enslave his people, and mass murder them, to get them to espouse his views… he convinced them that he was right. He even made a point of this. He had once stated to Heinrich Hoffman, his photographer, “I want to convince people that I am right.” He never wanted to force this.
Jewish democracy means killing the majority with reason.
Hitler’s Warning to “Democracies”
“Democracy means breaking the nation’s resistance;
To that end—abolition of the death sentence; But final aim subjugation of all nations—Hence Democracy=Dictatorship of the Proletariat.
Final resistance; class struggle; National intelligence [all] must be destroyed… the Jew as leech [p. 225].
This is exactly what can be witnessed in America and Europe today. The “democratic” political and “corporate” corruption has certainly transgressed the breaking point. America’s illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; and, the democratic nation of Israel imposing its “will to democracy” upon the entire Middle East; the dumbing-down of American education; as well as, the unskilled illegal immigrant influx into America and Europe. According to Hitler, all of this was inevitable, because we have allowed Jews to dominate our nations, businesses, and agendas. Live and learn.
References
Fellman, M. (1998). Citizen Sherman. New York: Random House Value Publishing.
Halsall, P. (1997). Medieval Sourcebook: Martin Luther (1483-1546): The Jews and Their Lies, excerpts (1543). Retrieved July 19, 2006, from http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/luther-jews.html.
Hitler, A. (n.d.) Adolf the Philosopher. Retrieved July 19, 2006 from http://www.adolfthegreat.com/Trails-Talent/philosopher-maxi.html.
Hitler, A. (1976). Hitler’s Letters and Notes. (W. Maser, Ed.). (A. Pomerans, Trans.). New York: Bantam Books.
|