|
Insights into Hitler’s Thoughts on Christianity and Islam: The Two Religions of God-Allah
According to St. John, in I John:
“… Antichrist is coming, so now many antichrists have arisen; whence we know that it is the last hour. They have gone forth from us, but they were not of us.” Here, John is specifically insinuating that these antichrists were Christians, though, subversive, false Christians, probably like the Jew St. Paul. He went on to say: “For if they had been with us, they surely would have continued with us [he is alluding to Jews here]; but they were to be made manifest [apparent], that not one of them is of us. But you have an anointing from the Holy One [Jesus] and you know all things. I have not written to you as to those who do not know the truth [the Jews], but as to those who know it [Christians], and because no lie is of the truth. Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ?” St. John is clearly condemning Jewry with this uncanny rhetorical question, and he reveals the Jews as the “liars” because they denied and murdered Christ. He went on: “He is the Antichrist who denies the Father and the Son.” John is literally ascribing the title of Antichrist to Jewry; not to any single man or woman of the future (I John 2:18-25).
“No one who disowns the Son has the Father. … that we should be called the children of God; and such we are. This is why the world does not know us [read: Christians], because it did not know him.” John was referring to the Jewish-Roman world, which denied Christ, and hence, denied God. “No one who abides in him commits sin; and no one who sins has seen him, or has known him. … He who commits sin is of the devil, because the devil sins from the beginning. To this end the Son of God appeared that he might destroy the works of the devil. Whoever is born of God does not commit sin, because his seed abides in him and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. In this the children of God and the children of the devil are made known” (I John 3:2-10).
Are we honestly supposed to believe that the whole world, including millions of good Christians, is evil; and that Israel is the only “good guy” in this whole world? Inane! I certainly do not condone what these Muslims are doing, but, every nation-state acts in its own best interest, and Israelis do not appear to be very “welcome” in the Middle East. They did bulldoze their way into Palestine, during, and just after WWII, mass-murdering hundreds-of-thousands, and driving millions more from their rightful homes.
Is this really the way a people would act, had they truly been victims of 4 years of Nazi-instigated genocide? I doubt it. How would Americans react against such inhumanity? Would Americans allow Muslim invaders to come steal their homes, forcing them to live in tents in a desert? Contemplate this situation.
The Account of Albert Speer
Albert Speer (1971) had stated, “Thus Hitler had little sympathy with Himmler in his mythologizing of the SS” (Speer, p. 141). According to Speer, Hitler had made a long-winded monologue regarding this very issue:
What nonsense! Here we have at least reached an age that has left all mysticism behind it, and now he wants to start that all over again. We might just as well have stayed with the church. At least it had tradition. To think that I may some day be turned into an SS saint! Can you imagine it? I would turn over in my grave…
Himmler has made another speech calling Charlemagne the “butcher of the Saxons.” Killing all those Saxons was not a historical crime, as Himmler thinks. Charlemagne did a good thing in subjugating Widukind and killing the Saxons out of hand. He thereby made possible the empire of the Franks and the entry of Western culture into what is now Germany.
Numerous enthusiasts of history are under the impression that Hitler had a distorted and inaccurate view of history and culture, but that is quite untrue. Not only has Steigmann-Gall refuted this, namely with regards to Christian history, but so too has the Jewish historian Lawrence Birken. Hitler actually had a far better grasp of history and culture than the great majority of his adjutants—many of whom were either ignorant or possibly even racist to some degree—and, he had acknowledged this problem and made attempts to correct it.
In numerous conversations with his Economic Minister Otto Wagener, Hitler had addressed this historical misinterpreting on behalf of his numerous adjutants and gauleiters. Furthermore, Hitler never demanded that the SS “worship” him, nor did he ever endorse Nietzsche’s alleged “Superman” theory. In fact, Hitler almost wholly dismissed Nietzsche’s writings and theories because of the fact that they were so overtly anti-Christian and pessimistic.
Speer (1971) had also said, “Himmler had scientists undertake excavations of prehistoric sites. Hitler commented”:
Why do we call the whole world’s attention to the fact that we have no past? It isn’t enough that the Romans were erecting great buildings when our forefathers were still living in mud huts; now Himmler is starting to dig up these villages of mud huts and enthusing over every potsherd and stone axe he finds. All we prove by that is that we were still throwing stone hatchets and crouching around open fires when Greece and Rome had already reached the highest stage of culture. We really should do our best to keep quiet about this past. Instead Himmler makes a great fuss about it all. The present-day Romans must be having a laugh at these revelations (Speer, p. 141).
Hitler reveled at the history and culture of the Hellenistic period more so than any other single era of Western history. He looked to the ancient Greek empire as the absolute cultural edifice, whereupon he would structure his Third Reich Empire. Hitler had also admired the culture, and especially the grandiose architecture of the Romans, but his real fascination lay with Hellenism.
Speer had noted, “Hitler believed that the culture of the Greeks had reached the peak of perfection in every field. Their view of life, he said, as expressed in their architecture, had been “fresh and healthy” (p. 143).
Hitler on Churches and Religion
Speer mentioned that Hitler had oftentimes denounced the churches in front of his “political associates in Berlin,” but that he refrained from such “harsh pronouncements” when he was accompanied by women. Speer had also stated that in the presence of women “he adopted a milder tone” (p. 141). Even so, according to Speer, Hitler had described the church as “… certainly necessary for the people. It is a strong and conservative element.”
Hitler had even spoken quite well of Reich Bishop Ludwig Müller, when he stated, “If only Reibi [the affectionate nickname Hitler established for Ludwig Müller] had some kind of stature. But why do they appoint a nobody of an army chaplain? [Indeed, why would the church do such a thing? This was an issue relating directly to the power-play struggle between church and state. This was one of Hitler’s biggest “pet peeves,” for lack of a better description, when it came to the churches in Germany. It had nothing to do with issues of God or faith, but rather, conflicts relating to political influence and power within the state. Hitler felt that the church need only concern itself with the spiritual and ethical realm of the people, but this was something that the churches simply would not do.] I’d be glad to give him my full support. Think of all he could do with that. Through me the Evangelical [Protestant] Church could become the established church [which is what Hitler ultimately wished to see happen], as in England” (pp. 141-142).
Here again we see Hitler’s preference for the more democratically-minded Protestant Church, as opposed to the staunchly conservative Roman Catholic Church. Even though Hitler was a Catholic and had greatly admired the edifice of the Catholic Church, he preferred the mind-set and political considerations, which were certainly more liberally-minded, of the Protestant Church. Notice also Hitler’s admiration for England in this passage. He looked to England for many answers to his dilemmas.
Hitler the Liberal?
Hitler’s own liberal upbringing during the pre-Weimar and Weimar years could not escape him, and this may have also been a significant contribution to his leniency regarding Jewish clemency exemptions, as well as his leniency towards religious political dissidents like Niemöller. No human being can ever fully escape their upbringing, because the prevailing ideologies, values, and attitudes of one’s upbringing are necessarily the source of their own radical thinking and/or ideologies. This is slightly ironic, in a sense; the fact that Hitler’s own revolutionary-reactionism against the somewhat perceived, yet somewhat truthful, Liberal-Jewish establishment, was the product of this very establishment. In other words, the Jewish-Liberal Weimar system was responsible for its own demise via Hitler and National Socialism, which it had produced.
And America…
We can see a very similar occurrence in America today; the revolutionary-reactionism of the American people, like the Minutemen, against the overtly Liberal-Democratic American establishment. This Liberal-Democratic establishment, which appears to have reached its peak in the latter half of the 1960s-early 1970s, and which is now increasingly on the decline, produced the Minutemen. The pattern to note here is the swinging of the socio-political pendulum—the pendulum has swung too far to one end of the socio-political spectrum, so the revolutionary-reactionism will counteract it, thus reversing the swing in the other direction, as Hitler had done when he was alive.
This is essentially the concept of the Hegelian Dialectic in action—we see the power-play between theses and antitheses constantly, and America is presently experiencing this process. It would probably be safe to say that the synthesis that emerges will result in one of two scenarios: The United States will experience the first major race war in its history since the clash with the Amerindians and will subsequently balkanize; or, the United States will undergo a complete Mexicanization and collapse, whereupon Euro-Americans will flee in the first mass exodus from the U.S. in history. The trends are not reversing, and as Pat Buchanan has pointed out in his most recent book, nothing except an immediate and drastic anti-immigration plan will stop the fact that there will be at least 100 million Mexicans in the United States (source Fox News interview with Pat Buchanan, 26 August 2006, The Heartland with John Kasich) in the very near future. This will be the end of the U.S. as we know it, because the Mexicans are collectively extremely hate-filled and at least as collectively race-conscious as Jewry.
Hitlerian Politics
Speer went on to say:
Even after 1942 Hitler went on maintaining that he regarded the church as indispensable in political life. He would be happy, he said in one of those teatime talks at Obersalzburg, if someday a prominent churchman turned up who was suited to lead the churches—or if possible both the Catholic and Protestant churches reunited. [Hitler had always maintained that he wanted to reunify Germany on every plane, including religiously. His concept of a united Volk of “One” transcended social, class, political, racial, and religious contingencies, but regrettably, this is not what had come to pass.] He still regretted that [Reibi] was not the right man to carry out his far-reaching plans [for reunification]. But he sharply condemned the campaign against the church, calling it a crime against the future of the nation. For it was impossible, he said, to replace the church with any “party ideology.” Undoubtedly, he continued, the church would learn to adapt to the political goals of National Socialism in the long run, as it had always adapted in the course of history. A new party religion would only bring about a relapse into the mysticism of the Middle Ages. The growing SS myth showed that clearly enough, as did Rosenberg’s unreadable Myth of the Twentieth Century (p. 142). So, Birken’s (1995) analysis is flawed, according to Speer and Wagener, as well as numerous others. Birken had stated, “Hitler understood that a war of national liberation required... invoking a martial ideology in which the nation replaced God” (p. 41).
Hitler Undermined
Speer went on to say, “If in the course of such a monologue Hitler had pronounced a more negative judgment upon the church, Bormann would undoubtedly have taken from his jacket pocket one of the white cards he always carried with him. For he noted down all Hitler’s remarks that seemed to him important; and there was hardly anything he wrote down more eagerly than deprecating comments on the church. I assumed that he was gathering material for a biography of Hitler” (p. 142).
The most troubling thing about this fact is that Bormann could very well have interjected these writings into the “stenographically-recorded memoirs” he produced entitled Hitler’s Table-Talk 1941-1944: His Private Conversations. Furthermore, some of these Bormann writings may have been interjected into Hitler’s Political Testament (a.k.a. The Testament of Adolf Hitler: The Hitler-Bormann Documents February-April, 1945, which has been extensively quoted from, by historians such as: Lawrence Birken (Hitler as Philosophe), John Lukacs (1945: Year Zero and The Hitler of History), and Sebastian Haffner (The Meaning of Hitler), among others. David Irving has dismissed this document as completely fraudulent, while others have said that the document must be used with caution. Radio Islam has made the entire document available to the public in various languages for free. Click here.
In my own view, I believe that the document has much valuable and truthful information in it, but it must be approached with caution, because Bormann committed it to paper at a time when he knew that the Third Reich was coming to an end. His bias, as well as potential misinformation and/or outright falsifications, should be recognized by the discerning mind.
Speer had noted, “Around 1937, when Hitler heard that at the instigation of the party and the SS vast numbers of his followers had left the church because it was obstinately opposing his plans, he nevertheless ordered his chief associates, above all Goering and Goebbels, to remain members of the church. He too would remain a member of the Catholic Church, he said, although he had no real attachment [affinity for] to it. And in fact he remained in the church until his suicide” (p. 142).
What about Hitler’s Suicide? That Was No Christian Act!
I think that it might be worthy to note here that many people call into question Hitler’s “Christianness” due to the fact that he had committed suicide. Yet, these same people offer absolutely no reservations as to Eva Hitler’s Catholic faith even though she, too, had committed suicide. Furthermore, could not martyrdom be considered a form of suicide? If that is a possible interpretation of the meaning of the term “suicide,” then Jesus Christ had also committed suicide [when the broader meaning of the term is applied to His death]. Moreover, the New Testament offers no information, either condemning or supporting, the act of suicide. Also, let us not forget that Chinese warriors and Japanese Samurai considered falling into enemy hands to be the ultimate disgrace and humiliation so, they would fall upon their own swords in an act of defiance. Was this not suicide? Hitler killed himself in this same act of defiance; he preferred to fall with his empire than suffer the humiliation of the “Allied” capture of his person. It was the fitting end for this great Christian man.
Lastly, suffice it to say, that if God is that petty—that He would reduce one’s whole entire life, and all of one’s many goodly deeds one had done unto one’s brethren, to one’s method of death—then one must seriously question whether or not God is really the Almighty. This inanity sounds too closely aligned with the pettiness of Yahweh in the ludicrous story of Isaac. Do not forget that Yahweh had actually ordered Abraham to murder his own son, and then essentially said, “Just kidding Abe, I was only testing you.” One must question the qualification of the Christian message, and faith in God, if the Creator of mankind is that petty of a barter. That is Jewish nonsense, and Jesus never attempted such inane actions or policies.
Hitler On Islam
Speer stated, “Hitler had been much impressed by a scrap of history he had learned from a delegation of distinguished Arabs. When the Mohammedan attempted to penetrate beyond France into Central Europe during the eighth century, his visitors had told him, they had been driven back at the Battle of Tours. Had the Arabs won this battle, the world would be Mohammedan today. For theirs was a religion that believed in spreading the faith by the sword and subjugating all nations to that faith. The Germanic peoples would have become heirs to that religion. Such a creed was perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament. Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire.
Hitler’s Public Perceptions of Christianity… Are they Qualified?
Hitler usually concluded this historical speculation by remarking: “You see, it’s been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness? It is remarkable that even before the war he sometimes went on: “Today the Siberians, the White Russians, and the people of the steppes live extremely healthy lives. For that reason they are better equipped for development and in the long run biologically superior to the Germans.”
And Rosenberg’s Mythos...
Lastly, Speer addressed the issue of Hitler’s attitude regarding Rosenberg’s book, Mythos. Speer had said, “The public had regarded the book as the standard text for party ideology, but Hitler in those teatime conversations bluntly called it “stuff nobody can understand,” written by “a narrow-minded Baltic German who thinks in horribly complicated terms.” He expressed wonderment that such a book could ever have attained such sales: “A relapse into medieval notions.” I wondered if such private remarks were carried back to Rosenberg” (p. 143).
Here we can see that either Hitler or Speer was not being completely honest, because Hitler knew that Christianity was not an inherently “meek” and “flabby” religion. In the dialogues (1923-1924) recorded by Dietrich Eckart (1996), the two of them [Eckart and Hitler] had discussed in veritable detail the evolution of Judaism into modern-day Christianity. Hitler had also discussed this extensively with Otto Wagener, who is a much more reliable, and far less dubious, source than Speer. According to the accounts of both Eckart and Wagener, Hitler had viewed the modern conception of Christianity, which he believed to be completely different from what Christ had preached and envisioned, to be a Judaized version of an otherwise suitable Western religion. In the Eckart dialogues, Hitler and Eckart both openly accuse and condemn St. Paul for the bolshevization of Christ’s message and teachings; so, Hitler may have been either venting to Speer, or was deliberately only revealing to him some of his feelings regarding Christianity. Or, it could also be that Speer misinterpreted or misconstrued this particular idea of Hitler’s. Furthermore, even when Hitler denounced Christianity in front of Kurt Ludecke, he simply does not come through as wholly believable.
Hitler probably withheld a good lot of his pro-Christian feelings for fear that it might reveal him as somehow weak or less hard than he had wanted to appear to be. This is quite comprehensible in light of the fact that Hitler never wanted to appear as anything less than the Fuehrer of Germany. That Fuehrer principle was taken extremely seriously by Hitler, and Wagener went into much detail in this regard in his memoirs, as did Kurt Ludecke.
Hitler had openly denounced Rosenberg’s book Myth of the Twentieth Century, but even so, many Jewish historians continue to act as though that book represented the bulk of the ideology of the entire Nazi-Sozi Party. That is not only untrue, it is almost the very opposite of the truth, as argued by historian Steigmann-Gall, in The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity. The only problem with Steigmann-Gall’s thesis is that he attempts to portray the Christian faith as inherently flawed, and potentially evil, due to the historical reality that Hitler and the majority of the National Socialists were undeniably great Christians. This is not an entirely flawed thesis, though, because the same argument has been put forth by historians like Mark Weber, with regards to the inherent flaws and evil of Judaism via the Bolshevik-Communist Revolution. Just as Christians had played an active and willing role, according to Steigmann-Gall, in the mass persecution, murder, and internment of European Jewry, so too had the Jewish-led Soviet Union played a crucial role in the mass murder of Ukrainians during the Ukrainian Famine, and the mass persecution and murder of ethnic Russians during the Bolshevik Revolution.
These two theses are very similar in their argumentation and approach. The question really boils down to whether or not Christians and Jews feel collectively guilty for what their people had done, or had allegedly done, to others in the past. The Jews have chosen to completely dismiss any and all collective guilt, as evidenced by their attitudes regarding civilian casualties and war today; whereas, European Christians have collectively allowed themselves to bear the alleged guilt of their forefathers, thus allowing the destruction and eradication of their faith—in favor of Jewish secular-atheism and democratic mob rule—and the destruction and eradication of their people via immigration and self-genocide.
As far as the future of the churches was concerned, Speer had consulted with both the Protestant and Catholic authorities as to where the new churches were to be built in the new areas of Berlin. Bormann was the only individual who opposed the building of these new churches for the future Reich (p. 242). If Hitler had really desired to eradicate the churches, then why did he allocate site locations, time, and money to them? Furthermore, why did he bother to put an end to the anti-church activities of Bormann and Rosenberg, even after he knew the war, and his personal future, was lost? According to John Lukacs, Hitler knew that the war was lost as early as 1941. Obviously, he cared about the future of Germany, and that future included the German churches.
The Account of American Journalist Stanley McClatchie
The “spirit and attitude of ‘Fascist’ Germany,” during the 1936 Olympic Games, according to Stanley McClatchie (2001), “I had the pleasure of conducting several of my countrymen ‘behind the scenes.’ We went one evening through the ‘Strength through Joy’ City, into the midst of the pulsating life of the people. Here we finally succeeded in finding table space in the gigantic Berlin hall, and were regaled with an entertainment such as has never been known in a cabaret or theatrical revue. Opera singers, ballet dancers, revue presentations… and at the end the entire audience joined in singing. … What enthusiasm” (p. 2).
“Afterwards I told them about the Reich Motor Highways, the most magnificent system of thoroughfares in the world; the Hitler Youth, the independently organized and directed organization of the German youth; the Land Year for the school children; the Labour Service; the great national community; the principle of leadership; the successful endeavors to provide employment for all of the workers (America is still burdened with 10 to 12 million unemployed [Great Depression]); the trebling of construction work and increase of automobile production to six times its former level; the magnificent German aviation service which encircles the globe, etc. My companions could scarcely believe their ears, but neither could I believe mine when I first entered the Third Reich just twelve months earlier” (p. 3).
Hitler’s social, economic, and political reforms were not only unprecedented for their time, but more importantly, they were all directly inspired by Hitler’s precept of a socialistic Christ-like community of neighbors helping and loving their fellow neighbors. America and Great Britain were still stagnating and falling ever deeper into their socio-economic quagmires of despair, while Hitler’s Germany was quickly becoming the most prosperous Western country in the world. Had it not been for the War, America and Britain might not have ever recovered from their respective plights.
“In any case, the world is becoming more socialistic, and it is merely a question of whether the socializing process will involve bloody class struggles, the decimating of the “bourgeoisie,” or whether it will proceed quietly and peacefully in the manner of national socializing, based upon social development and the foundation of national and Christian tradition” (p. 6).
This socialization of the world was stopped short by the rogue and godless-satanic capitalism and war-mongering of the false Christian Allies during World War II. The Jews and their international Gentile collaborators in Britain and America refused to allow the realization of a socialistic world where all peoples and classes could do well and live comfortably. Hitler’s socialism, Christian-based nationalism, and sense of community, as well as his flexible racial ideology, were not acceptable for the internationalists who sought to make the “New World Order” a hard reality. Illegal slave labor, rampant drug addiction, the destruction of the cultured European societies and peoples, the concepts of eternal war and strife, globalization, international macrocorporatism, the realization of the Antichrist headquarters of Israel, and the destruction of the intrinsic value of the human being and his labor, which were to be erased from the lexicon and thought processes of humankind, became the ‘fruits’ of the so-called “Allied victory.” These are the reasons why Hitler was destroyed and subsequently demonized.
“… and in the midst of this a swastika, an ancient symbol of the sun signifying the reviving force of all terrestrial forces of life” (p. 25). The swastika had also become a Christian symbol, as well as the symbol for good fortune.
“On January 30th, 1933, Adolf Hitler took over the helm of a helpless Germany and from that day onwards an astonishing revival began. Within 10 months the industrial employment figures revealed an increase of 25%”. … [Compared to America] Germany’s economic recovery was much greater,… and this in a poor country, exhausted by an unsuccessful war and a burden of heavy debts. This can be asserted even in comparison with the richest of all countries in the world where the natural resources are inexhaustible and the gold supply is more than 100 times as great as that in Germany” (p. 34)
“The National Motor Highways constitute the first network of roadways in the world which are entirely free of crossings [freeways] and which avoid all towns and villages. They represent the first carefully planned system of national roadways [which Americans copied] in the world” (p. 47).
“Religion grows from the spirit of piety, and the creative forces responsible for the New Reich are deeply religious in nature. All religion looks upward to the white radiance of eternity and the highest architectural expression of this striving is the Gothic dome. … Through the means of modern science, however, the newly awakened Germany has fulfilled this primaeval dream of humanity in a superb manner…. A gigantic dome formed of shafts of light suddenly penetrated the darkness, rising into endless space. No photograph could reproduce this overpowering impression; … During this consecrated moment when an endless dome rises above us we solemnly vow: ‘We believe in an Almighty God in Heaven who created us, watches over us and directs our actions, and who sent you, our Fuehrer, to free Germany…’” (p. 59).
“In television , however, Germany is the pioneer. The entire development of television is based upon the Braun tube invented by Professor Braun and the Nipkow grid of Paul Nipkow. … Germany has also installed the first television-telephone service in the world” (p. 69).
“German lightning express trains travel regularly at an average speed of 82 miles per hour. The fastest trains in other countries achieve a top speed of 75 miles” (p. 73).
New Germany’s achievements in 1936: Completion of the first 625 miles of the National Motor Highways, the most gigantic construction project in Europe; construction of the Reich Sport Field, the most stupendous sporting filed in the world; presentation of the largest and most magnificent of all Olympic Festivals (5 million visitors); victory of German sport at the Olympic Games, 33 gold medals being won; moreover, five gold medals in the Olympic Art Competition; repeated victories of German racing cars in all of the prominent international races; Max Schmeling’s victory over Joe Louis in New York; introduction of zeppelin service between Germany and New York; 99% participation of all authorized voters in an election—a world record; 42 million votes for one candidate (the Fuehrer)—also a world record; peaceful recovery of the last remnant of lost sovereign rights (occupation of the Rhineland)” (p. 90)
Hitler on Jewry: The Account of Otto Wagener
According to the memoirs of Otto Wagener, he had stated, “I can tell you, … In the sixteenth or seventeenth century, the Jews were expelled from the Rhineland, from Mainz down to the mouth of the Rhine. And at that time, a Polish king, deeply influenced by his Jewish bankers, took in the refugees. They were settled in southeastern Poland and the western part of the Ukraine, which at that time was part of Poland, and from there they spread over the whole of Russia in the course of the centuries.”
Wagener was quite correct in his historical recollection, as the Jewish influence in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Western Europe has been well-documented by various works, including: Karl August von Hardenberg’s essay entitled, “An Essay on the History of Jewish Emancipation”; in Joachim Haferkorn’s “Maximilian Harden: Gravedigger of the Second Reich”; Dr. von Leers’ essay entitled, “How They Got Rich”; and lastly, Fritz Rosenkranz’s essay “Judah’s Greatest Triumph: The Path of Suffering of the Russian Collective Peasant” (SS Publications, pp. 7-15; 21-29; 30-37, & 46-51).
“That is also the reason why all the Russian Jews speak German. In Russia it is called ‘Yiddish.’ The Jews there retained their German language down to this day.”
Hitler had replied by asking, “How do you know all that?... It’s quite new to me. But it must be true. And that may also be the reason why these Eastern Jews have such a drive to return to Germany.” [emphasis original]
Wagener replied, “How I know… I can no longer tell you precisely. But in years gone by, I studied all manner of things, and I also spent time with all sorts of people. It may be that I even learned this from Jews themselves. But history books report the same events.”
Kurt Ludecke had also elaborated on the Jewish Question, and the rotten history of the Jews in Europe in his memoirs entitled, I Knew Hitler. Ludecke’s recollection is excellent reading, and I would encourage anyone interested in Jewish history in Europe to read his personal account of Jewry.
Hitler pursued the subject. “The expulsion of the Jews has actually always been the universal remedy whenever they threatened to grow too numerous. But later, they always returned” (Wagener, p. 68).
Indeed, the Eastern European Jews are emigrating to Germany once again, and the Jewish community leaders are pushing the German government into converting Christian churches into Jewish synagogues of Satan. These Jews are also vigorously pushing a pro-Jewish and anti-German agenda, as evidenced by their ludicrous demands for a new enormous Holocaust memorial complex, like that of the Wieselthal Center of Lies in the U.S.
They have also demanded that the remaining Nazi-era churches be razed and that Nazi-era statues be melted down, because they find these honorable relics of Germany’s Christian past to be an insult to them as an allegedly persecuted people. The Jews are one of the few peoples throughout history who do not learn from history and, who continue to repeat the exact same mistakes that they had made in their recent past. Most other peoples in the world do not repeat the exact same mistakes; but, the Jewish mistakes of today are nearly identical to those that have been meticulously reported in accounts as dated as the Jewish Torah.
Hitler on Jewry and Palestine
Hitler went on to say, “But nowadays one cannot simply expel Jewry from a large nation. … Where should they go? Others are not eager to take them in, either.
“The British idea of establishing a Jewish state seems to have a great deal to recommend it. But whether Palestine is the right country in the first place and whether, in the second place, it is large enough to absorb ten to fifteen million Jews—that is still a major question.
“But there will not be ten to fifteen million all at once. The United States, for example, will not go along, that is certain. After all, the Jews in America have already seized almost all the key positions. They have achieved dominance and dominion. The promise has already been realized in the United States: All nations will be subject to you! [This biblical quote is in reference to Satan’s promise to Jewry that he would give them the labor and wealth of the world, which they mistakenly believed to have been the promise of God the Father. Satan tried to make this same promise to Christ, but Christ was not a Jew, and His moral superiority triumphed.] All right, then, the American Jews will not leave America [which they didn’t].
“… Of course parasites always congregate where the sap flows and can be tapped. In Hungary, they settle in Budapest and in other cities from which the country’s products can be shipped—that is, at the Danube and the Theiss rivers. Budapest already has, I believe, more than sixty percent Jews. … The same is the case in North America. New York, for example, has about three million Jews already. There, they sit like tapeworms at the source [which they still do today].
“… That is why the idea of a Jewish state there, in my estimation, has a quite different meaning. The Jew notoriously likes to remain anonymous so long as he is not in power. He takes off his mask only when he has gained domination—or at least when he believes he has. After the war [WWI], it seemed as if, thanks to the war, Jewry had won the upper hand throughout the white world. So the time seemed ripe for the Jews to pose as the masters. In Germany, that was, as it is now, indisputably evident. Then, when he has succeeded in seizing the leadership in all the white nations, all that remains is the establishment of a headquarters to truly dominate the world. And that would correspond to the Jewish state. Any sooner, such a state would make no sense, have no significance—it would even be a mistake.
“The fact that it is to be situated in Palestine, the Promised Land, the source, three or four thousand years ago, of the migration that would conquer the world—that is not only conceivable, but even proof that my train of thought is correct.
Indeed, the Jews never even wished to collectively emigrate from their host nations into Palestine, but they were ever keen on establishing that precious little piece of territory as the single most powerful command center of the world. What is most inconceivable, unto this very day, is the fact that Israel is the centerpiece of the foreign policy measures and wars of the entire modern white world. Hitler seems to have been an expert on Jewry, because nearly everything he had said about them, and had even prophesied, has come to pass, or is going to come to pass, if the West continues to support the illegitimate state of Israel.
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Hassan Nasrallah have become keen on this distorted and unjust reality of Western foreign policy, via the proxy state of Israel, and they are not going to stand by while this worldwide Jewish headquarters decimates their people and encourages the entire Western world to murder Arabs and Iranians for the consolidation of the entire world under Jewry. Indeed, if one is to accept the New Testament as a truthful document, and if one can accept the seriousness with which the Jews view the promise of Yahweh [Antichrist], then suffice it to say that they really are trying to control and subjugate the world. Whether or not this is a conscious effort, we will simply never know. Hitler did not think so, but even he had to admit to both Wagener and Bormann, that he simply did not know whether or not Jewry acted consciously.
“It also proves, however, that our struggle and our mission, which only we regard as the struggle and mission for Germany, is perceived by worldwide Jewry as if it were directed against its totality—against the Jews as such. Therefore, wherever they wield power, they will use it to paralyze and prevent our work.
Hitler knew that his economic policy and his return to socialist Christianity would incite international Jewry, but he was willing to take that chance. He acted on behalf of God, whereas the “Allies” acted on behalf of the devil himself. It is a hard reality to come to terms with when you realize that your own grandfathers died for the defense and implementation of the system of the Antichrist. Americans, Britons, Jews, and anyone else who had fought on the side of the Allies during WWII were all fighting for Satan. If you do not think so, then tell me that the world in which we live today is a godly and just world that Christ would have envisioned for His people. You cannot possibly defend that position knowing what you know about 90% of the world’s inhabitants. Take a look at Africa, Viet Nam, China, Korea, or even most countries in South America, and tell me that this is a loving and prosperous world of hope, Christianness, and love.
“That is why no nation would take in the Jews as a whole if they were to be expelled from Germany, nor would the Jews agree to a Jewish state in the sense of a concentration of the entire Israelite tribe. For in so doing, they would be betraying their faith in the promise; they would be giving up the struggle at the very moment when they thought they had, in fact, won it” (pp. 68-69).
“We must be very clear about the fact that we cannot remove the Jew as such. Rather, we must make it impossible for parasites to exist; we must prevent them from continuing to gain a foothold on the body of our Volk, from infusing poison into that body or attempting to gain power over it [as the Jews had already done in America, Britain, and Russia.] At that point, the Jews will leave Germany of their own accord. For when it becomes impossible for a parasite to live its parasitic existence in a certain place, it wanders off elsewhere, where conditions are more favorable to it, or it perishes. … It is hard for me to believe the Jew so purposeful and intellectually superior that he actually submitted these considerations so systematically in the councils of the Elders of Zion; that from the first he thought them through in the way I just elaborated—that would be uncanny. But his sixth sense guides him instinctively and unconsciously along the correct path, where, admittedly, consciousness has long since come to him” (pp. 70-71).
“… Which is the more dangerous enemy—I mean, the one that threatens us most immediately? Without a doubt it is Bolshevism—we can safely call it Jewish Bolshevism. For if it were not Jewish it could be given a different format. In that case, we might even be able to come to terms with it at some later date [had it been Slavic or Russian Communism]. But we will never be able to come to terms with Jewish Bolshevism without signing our own death warrant. … That is why we may not expel the Jews who live in Germany, we may not expropriate their goods, we may not harm a hair on their heads; and that is why we may not go public with our social economy and with other problems and plans, with which we would rouse liberalistic world Jewry and the entire liberalistic world against us. Rather, we must live peacefully with them! We can keep liberalism in check—indeed, we must do so—but it must be done very cautiously, sensibly, with economic expediency. And when we arrive at systematic economic control through the state, which is the problem everyone else is fiddling with, we must manage it in such a way that private property also survives for economic transactions and that private initiative is harnessed for our program” (p. 71).
References
Birken, L. (1995). Hitler as Philosophe: Remnants of the Enlightenment in National Socialism. United States: Praeger Publishers.
Bormann, M. (2000). Hitler’s Table-Talk 1941-1944: His Private Conversations (Hugh Trevor-Roper, Ed.). (Norman Cameron & R.H. Stevens, Trans.). New York: Enigma Books. (Original work published 1953)
Eckart, D. (1999). Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin: A Dialogue Between Adolf Hitler and Me. (W. Pierce, Trans.). West Virginia: National Vanguard Books. (Original work published 1923)
Ludecke, K. (1938). I Knew Hitler. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Lukacs, J. (1978). 1945: Year Zero. Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc.
McClatchie, S. (2001). Look to Germany. United States: USM, Inc.
Rami, A. (n.d.). The Political Testament of Adolf Hitler: February-April 1945. Retrieved August 27, 2006, from http://www.radioislam.net/historia/hitler/testam/eng/testa.htm.
Speer, A. (1971). Inside the Third Reich. (Richard & Clara Winston, Trans.). New York: Avon Books.
SS Publications. (2005). SS Creed Volume IV: Jews. (Unknown, Trans.). United States: Preuss. (Original work published circa 1938)
Steigmann-Gall, R. (2003). The Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, 1919-1945. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Wagener, O. (1985). Hitler—Memoirs of a Confidant (Henry Ashby Turner, Jr. Ed.). (Ruth Hein, Trans.). London: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1978)
|