|
Henry Ford, Sr., A.P. Laurie and Hitler: On Jewry’s Anti-Christianness
Contemplate it… white Western European peoples shamelessly and needlessly slaughtered one another in one of the bloodiest wars in history. For anyone to act as though one human being—Adolf Hitler—was solely responsible for this insanity, is to wholly lie to oneself. The true harbingers of the war-mongering spirit, as history is slowly revealing, were the Jewish-influenced Allies. Even Henry Ford, Sr. pointed this out in his book The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem. Ford’s book is really good. D*mn good in fact. One just has to read it, and suddenly the ‘ah-hah’ light comes on.
Ford wrote, “… No, it was precisely the Jews who led the Russian proletariat to the dawn of the Internationale and not only have led, but are also now leading the Soviet cause which remains in their safe hands. It is true that there are no Jews in the ranks of the Red Army as far as privates are concerned, but in the committees and Soviet organizations, as commissars, the Jews are gallantly [mis]leading the masses of the Russian proletariat to victory. … The symbol of Jewry, which for centuries has struggled against capitalism, has become also the symbol of the Russian proletariat, which can be seen even in the adoption of the Red five-pointed star, which in former times, as it is well known, was the symbol of Zionism and Jewry. … Mr. Cohan [Jew] says, ‘The symbol of Jewry… has become also the symbol of the Russian proletariat’” [The International Jew 242]. It is really tragic what had happened to the great Russian people. They were deceived and murdered en masse by a godless rabble, and when the rabble was through with them, they simply fled to a safe haven and left the Russian people to suffer their ill-begotten collective fate. Russia still has not recovered from the Bolshevik terror, but it seems as though Putin is beginning to put his country on the right track.
“The Star of David, the Jewish national emblem, is a six pointed star, formed by two triangles, one standing on its base, the other on its apex. Deprived of their base lines, these triangles approximate the familiar Masonic emblem of the Square and Compass. It is this Star of David of which a Jewish observer in Palestine [the rightful Arabian-Semitic homeland stolen during the Balfour Declaration] remarks that there are so few among the graves of the British soldiers who won Palestine in the recent war: most of the signs are the familiar wooden Cross. These crosses are now reported to be objectionable to the new rulers of Palestine, because they are so plainly in view of the visitor who approaches the new Jewish university” [243]. Clearly, Mr. Ford was upset at the ungrateful attitude displayed by the new conquerors of Palestine.
Mr. Ford went on to say something very uncanny and prophetic, “… the Bolshevik Star has one point less than the Star of David. For there is still one point to be fulfilled in the World Program as outlined in the Protocols [of the Wise Men of Zion]—and that is the enthronement of “our leader.” When he [I believe Mr. Ford is implying that this man is the prophesied Antichrist] comes, the World Autocrat for whom the whole program is framed, the sixth point may be added. The Five Points of the Star now apparently assured are the Purse, the Press, the Peerage, Palestine and Proletarianism. The sixth point will be the Prince of Israel” [243-44].
What I find most interesting about this passage, and the incredible foresight that Mr. Ford had, is the fact that he noticed that the Jewish-Bolshevik Star was a five-sided pentagram—the star of Satan himself. Naturally, it makes sense that when this “World Autocrat” comes upon the scene, he will make up that missing point, and perhaps this will signify the ushering in of the prophesied “system of Antichrist,” whereupon people will be coerced into taking the “mark of the Beast.” It is curious that the Jews had Christ murdered and are still awaiting their prophesied Messiah. This Messiah can only be Antichrist if one is to look at this rationally, as nothing else makes any sense.
What’s more is the irrefutable fact that the Jewish ‘Star of David’ consists of two independent interlocking triangles, which subsequently form six points, six distinctly smaller triangles, and six sides of a hexagram inside the ‘star.’ This is certainly a rendition of 666 and something worth pondering, especially in light of the fact that the two triangles are symbols of Freemasonry; a secret society that Hitler had completely banned once he came into power. In fact, a booklet on Freemasonry was published, 1n 1944, by Hitler’s government, in an effort to educate the SS on this anti-Christian organization; so that they could effectively combat it.
Here is a site that has some veritable information and noteworthy perceptiveness with regards to this issue. Though, I would encourage you to read all of this with marked reservation and much discretion. Here is one other site that has veritable insight as well. (Note: this article must be read in its entirety, including Dr. Eldeman’s comments). Even though this alleged ‘supercomputer’ was donned “The Beast” as a mockery, it does not necessarily make it any less significant with regards to the bigger picture. When this aspect is incorporated into other interpretations, such as those of Henry Ford, Sr., it holds much more sway.
Just as an aside, a Jewish man by the last name of Silverman is working on trying to implant microchips into undocumented immigrants in the US. I think this is probably just a mere coincidence, as I am fairly convinced that the “mark” is more than likely circumcision. Furthermore, it might be interesting to note that Jesus was never circumcised and claimed that circumcision was unnecessary in the New Testament. I will have to verify this to be certain, but the Jewish Talmud claims that he was uncircumcised, and hence, unclean, and was “buried like a dead dog in the same dirt heap as the Prophet Muhammed” [See Talmudic Teachings on Christ].
Hitler would not succumb to Jewish-Bolshevist masochism, so he stayed true to his word and defended his people, his nation, and his ideals to the very end. How could anyone possibly believe that the Allies wanted peace? Hitler’s attempts at reasonable negotiation were tossed asunder, as the Allies would have rather seen all of Europe enslaved by the murderous Bolshevist killing machine, than share power with Hitler. The only irrationality I can see, upon honest reflection, is that of America and Britain—two countries that had succumbed to liberalism, egalitarianism, communism, Marxism, and deception. Both countries are presently paying the price for the mistakes they made nearly seventy years ago. It seems to me that the only reason Europe has not really prospered is due to the impediments bestowed upon her by her repressive Zionist shackles. I may be incorrect, but this is how I conceive of the situation in the world today.
“If the German people are incapable of winning the war,” Hitler had said, “then they can rot.” In any case, the best were already dead. If he was to be beaten, he would fight for every house, nothing would be left. A great people must die heroically—it was a historic necessity” [The Rommel Papers 428].
Hitler had certainly become a hard-liner, if he had indeed said these types of things, by 1943. Even though he realized that the war for Europe’s salvation was lost, he was not going to be smote out by a murderous Jewish rabble if there was ever even the slightest chance of a reversal. He had a habit of clinging on to the slightest inkling of hope, even when things were going horrendously bad, because he had had such immense success all his life. It was only natural that he had come to think this way. It is a shame that Roosevelt and Stalin did not die sooner, because if they had, the world would certainly be much happier, safer, and more pleasant for everyone—as opposed to happier for just a few mega-elite nations. Unfortunately for posterity, Jewish propaganda was too powerful during the latter half of WWII, and the Jewish rabble was able to deceive the German people en masse, subsequently turning them against their own leader and government.
“The aggressive party in Europe to-day is not the Nazi party but the followers of Karl Marx [Jew] whether they call themselves Communists or Socialists” [65].
Something that really troubles me is the comparison of Bush and Hitler, or the comparison of America’s foreign policy with that of Hitler’s Nazi-Sozi foreign policy. I have already written extensively on the immeasurable differences between Bush and Hitler, so I will not focus on this too much here, but I have not really delved much into the realm of foreign policy.
Bush is a Judeo-Christian [in other words, a false Christian], an internationalist, and a globalist, as opposed to Hitler, who was a true Christ-Socialist [as argued by Steigmann-Gall in The Holy Reich], a staunch anti-internationalist, and an ardent isolationist. It might be worthy to note here that U.S. President George Washington was an avid isolationist, but also an active Christian.
Washington had said, “Don’t let anyone claim to be a true American. Don’t let them claim the tribute of American patriotism if they ever attempt to remove religion from politics” [Quoted from George Washington’s Farewell Address]. Hitler openly endorsed Positive Christianity in his NSDAP platform, thus he adhered to the same doctrine advocated by one of America’s greatest Founding Fathers; yet, people still attempt to criticize Hitler based on his religious beliefs because they were intertwined with the doctrine of the Nazi-Sozi State. This is bigotry, plain and simple. One cannot praise the Christian-Statism of Washington and denounce—at the same time—Hitler’s Positive Christian-Statism without contradicting oneself.
Bush is not a Christian; Hitler and several of the American Founding Fathers were Christian. This is the distinction that people have got to begin to understand. Hitler would not allow Jewry to control Germany’s destiny, nor the destiny of Europe, if he could help it. Bush, on the other hand, is actually endorsing the Judeo-Bolshevik Neo-Com[munist] totalitarian order that Hitler so virulently opposed.
To put it into ratio format; Hitler:Washington as Bush:Stalin. We might even say that Hitler is to Ahmadinejad as Bush is to Roosevelt. Hitler:Ahmadinejad :: Bush:FDR. FDR was racist, warmongering vermin. He ingratiated himself with Jewry too, just like Bush. Hitler tolerated and cooperated with Jews; he did not placate or ingratiate himself.
Bush is placating to the false Christian doctrine of global Zionism. Contrary to the fairytale versions of the Hitler of history, Hitler never wanted to “take over the world.” In fact, America seems to be the one who is “taking over the world,” as it has clearly waged more war, deposed more governments and leaders, and established more bases around the world than any other nation-state in history, in the world! Furthermore, Bolshevist-Jews seemed to be more apt to “take over the world” during Hitler’s day, as they were the ones endorsing and spreading Communism, via the Soviet Comintern, all throughout the world, including Korea, China, Vietnam, and parts of South and Central America.
Hitler wanted to share power with the United States and Great Britain—he did not wish to make Germany the world hegemon—but Jewry did not want that to happen, because Hitler was too much of a threat to the Jewish-led world economic order. Myriad scholars have written on this subject, so I need not get into it here, but, I will recommend a few books on the matter: Pawns in the Game, SS: Freemasonry, Hitler-Memoirs of a Confidant, Hitler’s Table-Talk, The International Jew, Onward Christian Soldiers, and The Iron Curtain Over America. I own all of these books and can attest to their immeasurable value.
“I thank God that the Peace of Europe is in the guardianship of the Führer and therefore, in spite of the frantic efforts of all those here and in Europe and America who want war, secure” [emphasis added] [179].
“This is the real quarrel that we [Gr. Britain] and the U.S.A., the two big money lenders, have with her [Hitler’s Germany]. If she came to the “city” to borrow £ 100 millions all the attacks in the Press, the denunciations on platforms, the utilization of the fugitive Jew as a political stunt would stop. The City pulls the strings and the Press obey” [emphasis original] [134].
“Hitler feels that Protestantism, which originated in Germany, is especially and peculiarly the type of Christianity which has become the national faith of the German people, and [he] is most desirous to see it working in harmony with the National Socialist State. To-day some 80% of the [German] churches are working in harmony with the Government. A section refuse to administer the simple regulations of the Government, and attack it violently from the pulpit,…” [110].
“Why kill Germans when we can starve them.” - Senator Pittman quoted by A.P. Laurie in The Case for Germany. Hitler has said, “I am no student of modern economics, and I must believe that the German who by his labor produces an article of use, such as food, has enriched and not impoverished the Reich” [119]. This quote alone should suffice as to how simple, yet utterly clear-thinking, Hitler could be. He defied the worldwide absurdity of Jewish economics, hence, he and his nation were liquidated.
Pertinent quotes by heroes of history who openly opposed Jewry:
Adolf Hitler Mein Kampf
Benjamin Franklin
“Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics [not to be confused with the modern definition of the term “Asian” or “Asiatic,” as these terms have evolved over time], let them be born where they will nor how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not even thou[gh] they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention.”
Jesus Christ New Testament “Be careful,” Jesus said to them. “Be on your guard against the yeast of the John 8:44: “You [Jews] belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.” Martin Luther The Jews and their Lies “He did not call them Abraham's children, but a ‘brood of vipers’ [Matt. 3:7]. Oh, that was too insulting for the noble blood and race of Israel, and they declared, ‘He has a demon’ [Matt 11:18]. Our Lord calls them a ‘brood of vipers’; furthermore in John 8:39-44 he states: 'If you were Abraham's children ye would do what Abraham did.... You are of your father the devil.' It was intolerable to them to hear that they were not Abraham's but the devil's children, nor can they bear to hear this today.”
|