|
On the Abuse and Misusage of the ‘Holocaust’ and Modern Jewish Power
First of all, congratulations on getting your masters degree. In the land of freedom and opportunity, you should now be able to embark on a lucrative, rewarding career in your chosen field; that is, if you forget everything you ever knew about truth and the results of your research of Hitler and the Third Reich. As this former SS man, Ted Junker, is finding out in Wisconsin, you don't mention your past association with 20th century's most evil man, even if, as he says about his memorial to Adolf Hitler: “I can’t understand why people don't know the truth. This is for understanding, not hate.”
Most Americans are not listening to his feeble plea, and I can imagine them bristling with disgust after reading this short news item, oddly published at NewsMax.com, the extreme right wing of conservative thinking. The reporter who dug up this story no doubt felt duty-bound to search the neighborhood for a Jewish spokesperson, and found one at the Milwaukee Jewish Council for Community Relations, in order to demonize Junker in the minds of readers. Here we learn that everything to do with Hitler and the Third Reich was entirely focused on one thing: the extermination of Jews. "Holocaust denial" is nothing less. Too bad Junker actually volunteered to serve in the SS back in 1940, before anything like an actual holocaust began. He is still a denier, and clearly does not appreciate the extent of Jewish suffering before that time, since then, and forever after.
The success of his memorial to Hitler on his property looks doomed. The same sort of thing is being played up by news groups like AP and Reuters as they purportedly quote Iran's President Ahmadinejad's denial of the Jewish holocaust and his desire to "wipe Israel off the map." As it happens, Ahmadinejad was misquoted in both instances, most likely intentionally. As the Guardian recently put it, Ahmadinejad never said his goal was to destroy Israel. He also never denied the Holocaust, but said that IF Europeans, especially Germans, believed that Hitler murdered 6 million Jews, then Palestinians should not have to pay the price for it. (I will send you this article from The Guardian and another published at Information Clearing House.) I would bet both AP and Reuters are aware that they continue to publish the misquotes. German publications are doing the same thing, which likely explains the mainly Jewish sponsored anti-Ahmadinejad (and anti-Iran) demonstrations in various German cities during the World Cup taking place there now. Further, German-Jewish organizations want Ahmadinejad arrested as a Holocaust Denier, which is illegal in Germany, if he should enter Germany to attend the games. In short, they want Ahmadinejad's blood; they want revenge; they also want war with Iran. I would suppose, by now, many conscience-stricken Germans go along with this parade of hate.
The moral of that story boils down to: Don't Mess with Jews.
Why? Because they will destroy you and possibly your career if certain Jews get wind of an anti-Jewish sentiment surrounding you. There is plenty of evidence that Jews destroyed the Third Reich rather than the other way around. I think in this respect even Hitler felt paranoid about what Jews wanted to do with him. Of course you know all this. But since the Third Reich went down in flames, Hitler emerged as an archetype, one which could be used in many ways to represent "evil." Merely speak the word, and there it is. That's good for the masses, but for academics like yourself who have done the research, it's evident that, as always, there is another side of the coin to observe.
My opinion is that chronicles of history cannot be entirely one-sided, which is our current state of affairs. It has affected the world to the extent that another terrible war, this one against Iran, is said to be imminent. Moreover, it is a war being incited by Israel, which all experts say would be catastrophic for the entire planet. On the surface, the reasons for it are Israel's concern for its safety from Iran's so-called pledge to destroy it, which we now know is false. As your astute essays and the links provide suggest, other forces are churning in the background, perhaps a build-up to a defining war between good and evil, say between Satanic power against Christ, who as Jesus never acknowledged the Jewish tribal god Jehovah as the "Father."
I personally am not so much a Christian these days, but I can understand this telling omission in the Gospels which most Christians have seemingly overlooked. Jesus alluded to a power, or force, greater than the evil, Satanic one, and therefore likely saw Jehovah as that Satanic power. And so, to contrast where he stood, he said, "I am from the Father". This seems to mean the REAL Father, a heavenly presence. Here we are talking about unseen forces, to which the Apostle Paul alluded; while Jesus had already identified the Jews with THEIR father, the devil. Potent stuff.
It may be the background for the Jews, or Israel as a symbol, to take a "last stand," as it were, in this great contest between Jews who yet hate and reject Christ as their Messiah, and the forces of war fought from high unseen places to settle the issue, led by Christ. After all, who but the Jews have taken up Satan's promise to deliver them the world; whereas, Jesus, as alleged in the Gospels, turned him away. Who can deny that Jews today pretty much do "rule the world?" They control the world's finances, the news, most of the American government (among others), business and the entertainment industry. In the end, most of the world belongs to them. Perhaps a defining war will determine if they get to keep it.
To conclude, thanks for your note—and for the fair appraisal of at least some segments of the SS, who had it in for the Poles more than for the Jews. I don't know much of the background for it, but, as written in The Elser Agreement, Hitler really did hate the Poles. This is borne out by the number of executions of Poles in various concentration camps. As great as these human losses were, in terrible circumstances at that, from what I can determine Poland has not to this date demanded reparations from Germany, or required total German humiliation for crimes committed now far in the past by people who are mostly dead. No need to mention which country has, time after time, year after year.
Emma: Yes, Hitler and Goebbels both had a real disliking, though I would not say outright “hatred,” for the Polish people. The reason they completely disrespected these people was almost solely due to the fact that the Poles chose to align themselves with Great Britain, as opposed to Germany, who had given them so much culturally, economically, etc. Hitler did not like it when neighboring Europeans displayed marked disrespect and un-appreciativeness regarding the gifts of the Germans (unto its many neighbors). Mr. P. Berg has informed me that Germany was responsible for much of the architecture and culture that Poland had/has. When they “slapped Germany across her face,” Hitler felt affronted. They paid a heavy price for willingly choosing war over peace. My grandfather was pure Polish and fought on the side of the US. Even so, he still regarded Hitler as Europe’s hero and a truly great man. I trust my own grandfather, a primary source, over some Jewish historian. Thank you so much for the comments, as they are incredibly well presented and insightful.
All best,
P. Darby
Author of:
Revenge of the Devil’s Dragons, and Once Again.
|