|
Hitler’s Christianity: A Living Faith
Hitler’s Beliefs in Review
Hitler told Bormann (2002), “A movement like ours mustn't let itself be drawn into metaphysical digressions. It must stick to the spirit of exact science. It’s not the Party’s function to be a counterfeit for religion…One may ask whether the disappearance of Christianity would entail the disappearance of belief in God. That is not to be desired” (Hitler’s Table-Talk, p. 61).
“…Possibly—but I cannot help thinking that man has been endowed with a brain which he is intended to make use of, and that anything which is founded on a premise unacceptable to the human intellect cannot endure forever. It is not possible to hold fast for very long to tenets which the progress of knowledge have proved to be false. … In my eyes the ability of mankind to reject a proven untruth is one of its virtues. … It adds little to our knowledge of the Creator when some parson presents to us an indifferent copy of a man as his conception of the Deity. In this respect, at least, Mohammedan is more enlightened, when he says: to form a conception of Allah is not vouchsafed to man.
The most pressing danger, as I see it, is that Christianity, by adhering to a conception of the Beyond which is constantly exposed to the attacks of unceasing progress, and by binding it so closely to many of the trivialities of life which may at any moment collapse, is ripening mankind for conversion to materialistic Bolshevism. And that is a terrible tragedy. Man will lose all sense of proportion, and once he considers himself to be the lord of the universe, it will be the end of everything. And if the Church in Spain continues in the way it is doing, it will end up on the refuse-heap. … The Church of today is nothing more than a hereditary joint-stock company for the exploitation of human stupidity” (Ibid., pp. 606-607).
In this striking and revealing passage, Hitler expresses his personal belief that the most pressing danger is Christianity’s inflexible dogma, especially in light of scientific progress and social change. Hitler essentially felt that Christianity could only continue its existence if it evolved with mankind; both spiritually and sociologically. He argued his point by citing the case of Galileo. Before Galileo’s discovery, geocentrism was an irrefragable truth within the context of the Christian ethos. After Galileo’s discovery, geocentrists were outright liars. Hitler felt that this constant give-and-take between reason, science, and Christianity was not only healthy, but necessary for the survival of the Christian faith. He argued that its ethos had to broadened, as he felt it was far too dogmatic for the people it was designed for.
Analysis of Lutzer’s Hitler’s Cross: Jews as the “Chosen” of Lucifer, not God
I recently purchased a book that proposes a thesis arguing that the Jews are the ‘Chosen people of God’, and that Christians owe the Jews eternal sympathy for the alleged ‘Holocaust’, as well as centuries-forgotten persecution of Jews at the hands of Christians. Well, I am going to shatter this thesis because it is so weak I can hardly believe it has actually made it into print, but for Christianity’s sake, I am grateful it did. I am even more grateful that it fell into my possession.
There are several points made in this proposition of ‘anti-Christianism,’ which literally made my jaw drop at the sheer rapaciousness of the arguments put forth. Suffice it to say, that this little hate tract will collapse like a deck of cards when it has been put through the grinder of scholarly scrutiny. So, let us begin shattering this lie.
First of all, we must begin with the understanding that Hitler was indeed a Christian, and as a matter of fact, a very good one, for his part. He was able to usher in the brotherly community of Christ’s will, which the world would not have. With the utmost viciousness and ferocity, the Allies tore Hitler’s person down in the savage Jewish-led media frenzy that erupted upon Hitler’s numerous and miraculous achievements. By donning him a “madman” who wanted to “take over the world,” they managed to mobilize nearly the entire world against Hitler’s Christian Soldiers—many tens of thousands of whom were ethnically [by National Socialist standards] Jewish. Yes, Hitler allowed 150,000 or more Jewish soldiers to fight for his Christian Wehrmacht against the devil’s hordes during the Second World War.
What is especially troubling to me is the daunting fact that “Christians” have forgotten what Christ actually said. He said, “They will hate you because of me.” Today, nobody is more hated, blasphemed, lied about, and smashed into the ground than Hitler and Germany. Indeed, some alleged “scholars” elicit such ridiculous theories, that they are indigestible at best… the likes of which propose that Germans were half-demon. Excuse me? Come again, satanic, Jew-lover…half-demon? This is so outrageous and absurd that I will not even give it one minute’s time aside from mentioning that this scholastic anti-Germanic trash actually exists and makes money for some false Christian organization in the world today.
That being said, I will continue with Hitler’s conception of Christianity and his attempt to restore it to its former Christ-endowed purity and greatness.
Hitler wanted more than anything to mend Christianity, as it was a broken religion that had been completely misconstrued, primarily by St. Paul, who Hitler had accused of ‘using Christianity’ to usher in “proto-Bolshevism,” thus serving as a protective barrier for the Jewish agenda. Dr. MacDonald’s Culture of Critique contains many quotes, straight from the mouths of Jews stating, “Once a Jew, always a Jew. Anti-Semitism is good, as it reminds us [Jews] who we are” [not verbatim]. This being said, it is not unfathomable to conceive of the idea that Rabbi [St.] Paul may have ushered in Bolshevism—which entails the ideas of liberalization, egalitarianism, oneness, internationalism, Communism, the erasing of identity so that all classes and races can be enslaved by the law and authority—as opposed to the idea that he helped convey Christ’s teachings to the peoples he ministered unto.
When I first started studying Hitler’s ideas about Christ and Christianity, I thought the man was crazy, but in time, and with much careful study of not only Hitler himself, but also Christianity, history, Jewish history, and National Socialism [Nazism], I came to some intensely edifying realizations I had never dreamed I would actually begin ardently arguing.
Rabbi [St.] Paul was alleged to have had the spirit of ‘evil’ Saul, but many Christians have rejected that Rabbi Paul remained ‘evil’ [I dismiss the term ‘evil,’ as I do not believe humans are ‘evil’ in the sense of the true meaning of the word, hence I have encased it in quotes.] I must question this after careful scrutiny of Paul’s teachings. The first thing I have found troubling is that Paul taught that “we should be subject to political authorities” [no matter how bad they may be? He does not specify, so we have only to assume ‘yes’] (Hitler’s Cross, 23). Jesus, on the contrary, said, “Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and unto God the things that are God's” [quoted from Sobran’s Jesus’ Government]. This is in complete contrast to what Paul said. One must call into question whether or not Paul was truly following Christ’s will when he preached something different than what Christ would have preached. Indeed, Sobran goes so far as to say:
“Even most Christians believe in the state, though Jesus never urged his followers to take political action. A very devout and intelligent Catholic socialist friend of mine argues that Jesus legitimized the state when he said, ‘Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s.’
But that's reading an awful lot into a few words. Jesus wasn't preaching to his followers at that moment; he certainly wasn't preaching statism, let alone the authority of pagan emperors who claimed divinity and demanded idolatry. No, he was retorting to a trick question from his enemies [Jews], and he answered with a witty tautology. It might have been taken to mean, ‘Give Caesar everything he claims, and also give God his due.’ But it could also mean, ‘Give Caesar nothing, and God everything.’ Or it might mean something else; Jesus didn’t specify.”
This means that Rabbi Paul may have very well ‘spun’ Jesus’ words to perpetuate his agenda. It is certainly an issue that merits attention.
Hitler claims to have undergone a religio-political epiphany, or conversion, while he lay blinded, as a result of an “Allied” chlorine gas attack on innocent German soldiers, in a hospital. As a matter of fact, this may well be true, as Hitler seemed to be ‘protected’ from death on many occasions. He survived half a dozen assassination attempts throughout his entire lifetime, at a time when politicians and revolutionaries were regular targets of assassination. Indeed, the Jew Eisner fell victim to an assassin after being in power for only a very short time (taken from Fest’s Hitler, Lutzer’s Hitler’s Cross, and Payne’s The Life and Death of Adolf Hitler).
Not only was Hitler’s life spared of assassination, it was also spared accidental death on many occasions. Two I can recall off the top of my head are when he was nearly run down by Hoffmann, the other when he, Heß, and Wagener were victims in a very bad car accident involving a huge Mercedes truck. Wagener and Heß were in pretty bad shape, whereas Hitler escaped with a couple of scratches and no injuries at all. The radiator of the truck that hit them had actually gone through to nearly the middle of Hitler’s car and had smashed the three of them against the passenger door. I would have to say that it may well be true that Hitler had someone looking out for him, but one must be able to accept the belief in guardian angels of sorts. I do not believe for one second that God Himself intervenes in human affairs, otherwise children would certainly never fall victim to vicious rape, torture, and murder by pederasts on a daily basis. It is my belief that God works within the parameters of natural law and order, however, angels may well be spiritual agents that can directly change the course of fate for individuals on earth. I will leave this up to you, but Hitler’s luck was definitely not the norm (this information taken from Wagener’s Memoirs, Ludecke’s I Knew Hitler, and Lutzer’s Hitler’s Cross).
Hegel and Nietzsche: Synthesis vs. Nihilism
I will now move on to the theories of Hegel and Nietzsche, both German philosophers who, along with Jesus, probably had significant impact on Hitler’s ideology, as well as the ideology of all Europeans, especially Germans.
Hegel essentially believed that God revealed Himself in the course of human history. He proposed the dialectic, which the Jew Marx utilized, but twisted to accommodate the inhuman agenda of Communism, atheism, and materialism. In fact, Marx went so far as to propose that history was nothing more than economics and materialism… a most limited and belittling view of everything human. I might like to note here that Hitler believed Marx to be a modern day Mardochai, and thought he was one of the most horrific people to have lived. Hitler was quite moved by the Russian bloodletting at the hands of a Jewish-led government that led to the mass murder of some 30 million or more Slavs, Ukrainians, and ethnic Russians. Anyone can verify this mass murder campaign by watching Harvest of Despair: The Forgotten Holocaust (DVD). It was one of the single worst crimes against humanity ever committed in human history, along with the Spanish Inquisition (in which Jews also played a very significant role), and the atomic mass murder of innocent and unknowing Japanese civilians by the “Christian” American government (need I mention that Einstein was Jewish?... or that Roosevelt is alleged to have been a Dutch Jew—Rosenfeld?) This is a mere sampling of the considerable Jewish involvement in mass atrocities against humanity. It is not hard to see why Hitler, especially in light of the fact that Jews declared war on Germany (see Theodore Kaufmann’s Germany Must Perish! and International Judea Declares War on Germany), disliked Jews as a group. It was only after this had happened that Hitler ordered harsher measures against Jews and ordered that they wear yellow stars for identification purposes (taken from Kaufmann’s Germany Must Perish!, Goebbels’ The Göbbels’ Diaries, and Irving’s Hitler’s War). As a matter of fact, it may have been suggested to him.
I would now like to mention the fact that many authors claim that Hitler was a satanist, atheist, or anti-Christian, or that he subscribed solely to the ideas of Friedrich Nietzsche. None of this is true. Hitler believed in God, Hitler venerated Christ and His teachings and made certain that the German youth were educated in Christ’s teachings and the New Testament, and he was not an occultist or satanist at all. In fact, Hitler eradicated all of the many secret societies, never established Wotanism/Odinism as official religions,—in fact he discouraged paganism—encouraged and openly endorsed “Positive Christianity,” never launched attacks against the churches or people of the faith (except when they preached against the government or the state, and even then he was usually lenient with them), and he reprimanded Bormann and Rosenberg when they attacked the churches. Nearly all the SS men attended church regularly and Léon Degrelle—leader of the Wallonie SS Division—was an ardent Catholic, very deeply religious, and also an ardent SS man and Hitler supporter. In fact, Degrelle came to Hitler’s defense and continued to speak very highly of the Führer unto his death. [See Degrelle’s Epic: Story of the Waffen SS, Ludecke’s I Knew Hitler, Dietrich’s The Hitler I Knew, Eckart’s Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin, Wagener’s Hitler-Memoirs of a Confidant, Steigmann-Gall’s Holy Reich: Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, and Helmreich’s The German Churches Under Hitler. See also nobeliefs.com).
Moreover, Hitler prayed, invoked God’s help during speeches, and closed speeches with “Amen” many times. He was born and raised Catholic and never renounced his Catholicism. Also, contrary to popular belief, he never pulled the Bible out of public schools, as he wanted the German youth educated in the ways of Christ and true brotherhood. Indeed, Hitler’s Germany stood out as the exemplar of brotherly love and peace, and had it not been for the vindictiveness and jealousy of the so-called “Allies,” the Second World War would never have happened. The only war Hitler wanted to wage was against the inhuman and murderous Jewish-led regime of the Soviet Union (see Hitler’s Mein Kampf, Hitler’s Hitler’s Second Book, Memoirs, The German Churches Under Hitler, Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, Hitler’s Cross, Bormann’s Hitler’s Table-Talk, Epic: The Story of the Waffen SS, or any number of Hitler’s Speeches).
Hitler believed that Nietzsche was far too pessimistic, and he dismissed his theories as “nihilistic”. He preferred the positive and hopeful ideas of Schopenhauer, Jesus of Nazareth, Richard Wagner, and Bismarck. It is untrue that Hitler “reinterpreted the cross of Christ to advance a pagan agenda” (Hitler’s Cross, 30). The truth is, that nearly the entire SS and German army were members of the Catholic or Protestant Churches, bishops were sent to the front to minister to the soldiers, and Hitler never established paganism as the official religion of the Reich. The official Party Program authorized “Positive Christianity” as the official religion of the Reich, but allowed religious freedom and tolerance upon the wishes of individuals. (See Epic, Nazi Conceptions of Christianity, The German Churches Under Hitler, Ericksen’s Theologians Under Hitler, or Fabricius’s Positive Christianity in the Third Reich).
The Account of Dr. Cajus Fabricius
Dr. Cajus Fabricius, a brilliant man, theologian, and author of Positive Christianity in the Third Reich, claimed that Christian teachings and Christianity were the very basis, or foundation, upon which Hitler’s National Socialism was built. Think about it. If Hitler’s Germany was so horrible and ‘evil,’ then why did it foster such immense support—from the Church (Hitler’s Cross), but especially with regard to Waffen SS volunteers from all over Europe, and even a few from America and Britain and various other foreign countries—unto the very end of the war? How does one explain the photographs depicting tears of joy, peacefulness, happiness, brotherly deeds, etc. if Hitler was so ‘evil’ and his government was so treacherous? Let us not overlook the tremendous number of people, including Jews, who survived these alleged ‘death camps’. If Hitler was so hate-filled and murderous when it came to his alleged extermination policy, then why would he have committed suicide not knowing whether or not his alleged ‘extermination policy’ was carried out to its end? This seems odd for a man who is alleged to have sacrificed victory in the Eastern campaign in favor of ‘exterminating’ Jews. You mean to say, that Hitler diverted precious war materiél—supplies of clothing, food, artillery, etc., etc.,—which may have ultimately cost him the war he so ardently had committed himself to winning, only to end his life before he knew that it [his ‘policy’] had been fully implemented and carried out? This is really presuming a lot, in fact, far too much. Not only that, Hitler responded to the liberation of the eastern camps with a simple, “Ja.” One would think that Hitler would have said something like, “I hope you made preparations.” But he simply said, “Yeah” (this argument was put forth by David Irving in his talk “The Secrets of the Göbbels’ Diaries”). Need I mention that my great grandmother, as well as her parents, survived WWII? (My great grandmother was a Handstein [Polish-Jew].)
No Jewish Genocide Occurred Under Hitler
Hitler even acknowledged that the rumor of extermination had been attributed to him, however he dismissed it as nothing more than a rumor during a casual conversation with Bormann, and he probably imagined that it was no worse a rumor than those of the First World War. Germans were accused of murdering 6 million Jews during WWI, as well as throwing infants in the air and sticking them with bayonets. All of this has since been dismissed as absurd, but the Jews have made certain that their Holofable propaganda story has stood the test of time [it did not even begin until the 60s, as official Red Cross documents placed the number [of all victims] at under a few hundred thousand perished in German hands, many to disease and starvation, which could mostly be attributed to “Allied” bombings of the railways carrying supplies to the prisoners in the camps.] So, if the ‘Holofable’ is indeed a propaganda piece that has become overbloated and completely distorted over time, then suffice it to say that Hitler has been wrongly condemned and he deserves to be exonerated and venerated for being one of the most incredible leaders in history. This is where he stands in my scholarship, as the Jews have the burden of proof. (These documents are available online, as well as from numerous sources, such as JHR). Their whole tale is based on the logical fallacy of assumption, especially in light of the fact that eyewitnesses, many alleged, and statements are never accepted over scientific proof and reason. The Jews rely entirely on statements and assumptions to make their tale hold together.
Furthermore, they have to throw people in prison and frighten them into submission in order to perpetuate their enormous white lie. Hitler said that a Big Lie was much more readily digested by the sheeple than a little lie. He wanted to make sure that the average sheep was exposed to this precept, as the Jews harken unto it like bloodsucking ticks clinging to, and devouring the blood of an unfortunate canine. Hitler bared his heart and soul in Mein Kampf—as he never felt that he had anything to hide from anyone, including foreign countries. Indeed, Hitler even went so far as to explain to the sheeple that effective propaganda and control of the masses was essential for sufficient rule. What kind of aspiring leader tells people this kind of stuff? An honest one who has nothing to hide. Hitler never tried to deceive anyone, so, the notion that he was Antichrist, or a predecessor thereof, is absurd. The only people who mask themselves from the public are the Jews. They change their names, mass murder Gentiles, and cloak their true heinous intentions behind a façade of niceness; the truth, as revealed by St. John and Martin Luther, is that Jewry, as a Volk entity, is Antichrist. Any Christian who allies him- or herself to this creature of Israel is a false Christian. Any questions? I didn't think so.
Cherry-Picking the Evidence: Forté of Jewish Scholarship
I might also bring up the fact that if the Jews and other “scholars” are going to adhere to the argument that Mein Kampf was absolutely genuine and honest, which I do believe it was—Hitler may very well have felt and believed that his career was over when he dictated it, as he himself had even admitted that he wrote it as a “warning” to his people—then these so-called “scholars” would do well to make note of the fact that Hitler set forth the state endorsement of Positive Christianity in this book, as well as his absolute belief in himself as a warrior for God. So, why do they dismiss the Christian and divinely-inspired parts of Hitler’s book as a mere façade, with which he “fooled” the masses, while at the same time accept his thoughts on Russia and Jewry as genuine? You either accept the internal validity of the book or you don’t; scholars cannot cherry-pick the evidence like this, or they will be taken to task. I am taking them to task on these issues.
Let it also be known that there is an enormous difference between bias and cherry-picking, which I believe is very important for average people to comprehend. If one leaves out evidence or continuously refuses to address certain problematic pieces of evidence—in other words, if scholars continue to fail to account for challenges to their theses—then that constitutes academic fraud. The Jews refuse to account for historical revisionist findings regarding the alleged Hollowco$t, therefore, they are guilty of academic dishonesty and fraud. They choose, instead, to take scholars to court to denounce them; thus, supposedly proving to the ‘world,’ that they are just “anti-Semites,” but, these Jews fail to address the actual evidence and findings of said scholars. The best example is David Irving. Deborah Lipstadt (self-proclaimed Hollowextortion ‘expert’) did not prove a damned thing in court against him, only, she revealed that he gave talks to alleged “neo-Nazis,” and, that he is supposedly an “anti-Semite.” However, neither of these issues have hurt his findings or the evidence he has come across while researching Hitler and the Third Reich. And, as time rolls on, Irving’s thesis, regardless of whether or not he has manipulated or left out some evidence, is able to withstand almost all scrutiny, especially as regards the recent thesis Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers by Bryan M. Rigg.
Furthermore, the Jews have arrested, tried, and imprisoned numerous challengers to the alleged holocaust, which indicates to me that they have many things to hide. Now, let us briefly examine the Christian Problem to put this into context. The Church used to do this same exact thing to alleged “heretics” who questioned the premises of the Christian dogma. But, the truth had to prevail in the end, as it is the will of God to reveal the truth, so, the Church ended up accepting the undeniable fact that humanity visually perceives the Earth to be round, not flat. The Christian scholars then had to begin accounting for this. It all turned out just fine in the end, didn't it? Christianity still exists, and as a matter of fact, it seems to be more believable now than it was then. Perhaps we are slowly getting to the ultimate truth, as Hegel had espoused.
Hitler’s Christian “Drittes Reich”
Hitler was a true Christian and his nation was a Christian nation as Christ would have wanted it to be. The “Allies,” unfortunately for the true Christians, had succumbed to Jewish power and Jewish war-mongers who would not tolerate a country that: wanted to cut off international finance, not participate in globalism, not partake of egalitarianism, not commit national suicide, not tolerate anti-human Communism, and not exchange human labor and worth for a piece of worthless paper (money… the root of all evil and the forté of the Jew). It is no wonder the Jews in power skewed American and British foreign policy in favor of total war against Hitler and Germany, as they [the Germans] were the Christians fighting against the devil’s hordes. Who in their right mind could possibly object to Hitler’s living Christian faith, except God’s “Chosen”? His ‘elect,’ as it were. The only people vain enough to actually believe that God chose them above all other peoples on earth. False Christians will buy into this devilry, and Christ warned that very few would find the Kingdom of Heaven. Indeed, He said, “The meek will inherit the earth.” In other words, the great ones, the divine ones, the true people of Christ’s glorious and unadulterated message to humanity, will inherit the Kingdom of Heaven… and rightly so. The meek will lull upon the short-lived earth, and decay with it unto the end of time under Jewish rule.
Jewish Blaspheme
As it was said, “In the divine believe only those, who are themselves divine” (SS Culture Series-Christianity). Christ said, “You are all the Children of God” [not verbatim]. Moreover, Christ said, “Bring the Jews before me and slay them.” I think that this statement is quite clear and certainly does not need ‘interpretation’. Jesus was anti-Jewish and that is why the Jews denounced Him as a “magician” and “bastard,” and subsequently had him crucified. Need I mention that even the Jews claim that Jesus was certainly not the Messiah, and was actually “the son of a whore” and the “Roman soldier Pantera?” Historical texts on the life of Jesus put forth this same thesis, and it may well be true. Hitler seems to have accepted it and essentially proclaimed that Christ was indeed an Arian (since his father was Roman) and more correctly the Gentile Savior (from the Jews who Hitler donned the “scourge of humanity”). Erwin Lutzer claims that a Jewish woman—during a Bible study—said that she “feared studying the New Testament and prayed, ‘Oh God, turn out to be anybody but Jesus’ ” (Hitler’s Cross, 84). Unfortunately for the Jews, historical fact cannot be altered and it is true that Jesus, like Luther after him, became anti-Jewish after He had been pushed over the edge with their blasphemy, usury, unbrotherliness, pride, atheism, and condemnation of Gentiles. They went so far as to call Jesus the “son of the devil,” “bastard,” “liar,” “conjurer,” “fool,” and that He had been “buried in a pit of hell, along with Muhammed, with dead dogs and asses.” (see “Talmudic Teachings on Christ and Christians”).
“Today many Jews are atheists because of the ‘Holocaust’. We owe a debt to the Jews that we can never repay. The Bible we hold in our hands is a Jewish book [unless you own an authentic Hitler-inspired “de-Jewified” edition of the New Testament or a Jefferson Bible by Thomas Jefferson], for as Paul said, ‘they were entrusted with the oracles of God’ (Romans 3:2, needless to say, if this is what Rabbi Paul taught the Romans, it is no wonder Hitler believed Paul to be a typical cunning Jew who was up to no good). And they have given to us a Savior, their Messiah, who has washed us from our sins in His own blood” (Hitler’s Cross, 84, 88). Oh please!
All I can say in response to this passage is this: If anyone actually believes this blaspheme that is used like a subtle poison against Christians and the Western world, I really feel sorry for you. This is the very clap-trap that Hitler staunchly rejected as ‘rubbish’ and ‘indicative of self-suicide’. Nietzsche called it the ‘triumph of slave morality over master morality’. It is for this reason Nietzsche rejected Christianity. Moreover, Luther also reviled this Judaized Christianity and called the Jews, “the followers of Satan himself” (see Mein Kampf, Memoirs, Table-Talk, Nietzsche’s The Antichrist, and Luther’s On The Jews and their Lies). Lutzer claims that the alleged ‘Holocaust’ caused many Jews to become atheists. Could not one say that the Judaization and undermining of Christianity caused many Christians to fall away from their faith? You cannot cut your cake and eat it too, Mr. Lutzer.
Lutzer actually goes so far as to tweak Apocalypse to his false Christian doctrine claiming that Hitler’s alleged ‘final solution’ (which by the way was not final at all, as Jews still exist) was the “direct activity of Satan.” He claims that this can be read in the story of Apocalypse involving the “dragon” and the “woman”. I hate to have to inform Mr. Lutzer, but Apocalypse either happened with the fall of Rome, or has not yet come to pass (as most responsible theologians espouse). And if he is going to attempt to argue this, then clearly, the system of antichrist must naturally be ushered in by the very people who oppose and refuse to accept Christ. The antichrist wields power the world over, enslaves the nations under the monetary system, makes wars to enslave the world’s peoples under his worldwide capitalism, and his people are marked. Now let me think, who is marked (possibly circumcision as at least one of the “marks of the beast”), who opposes Christ (the Jewish people, with the exception of individuals who may account for the 144,000 Jews who will see the Kingdom of Heaven), who wields the most power in the world as a cohesive and collective group and has enough sway to make wars (the ‘Jewish Lobby’ and state of Israel), who is the Babylon who will fall (likely to be America—the whore who ‘rides’ the Dragon (Israel)), and lastly, who was the Pope referring to when he said, “We are living under an evil system. Do not try to be God unless you are God” (heard from the Jew, Michael Savage-Weiner, during The Savage Nation)? I myself believe the Pope to be an antichrist, among many, in the current evil Jewish-Zionist system of Antichrist. His menorah-lighting in the Catholic Church is evidence enough. Moreover, he announced that he would defend the Jews against the phantasm of “anti-Semitism.” There’s no such thing. That is as absurd as a Christian pastor or priest proclaiming to all Christians that he will protect them from “anti-Christianism,” or, an Imam proclaiming that he will protect all Muslims of the world from “anti-Islamism.”
Whatever.
Conclusion
In closing, I would like to quote Rabbi Paul one last time. He said, “And thus all Israel will be saved; just as it is written, ‘The Deliverer will come from Zion,’ He will remove ungodliness from Jacob. And this is My covenant with them, when I take away their sins.” Lutzer says, “Virtually the entire nation living at the time of Christ’s return will be spared physically and saved spiritually. Christ sets up His millenial kingdom where Jew and Gentile are equally received and welcomed” (quoted from Hitler’s Cross, 98.) This ‘Deliverer’ is more than likely Prince antichrist, especially if he comes from ‘Zion.’ Christ said, “Let those who have the ears to hear, hear… many will come in my name, but do not be deceived… for you will know them by their words” [not verbatim]. Henry Ford, Sr., God bless his soul for all time, had said that the Jews were awaiting their “Prince.” They had already attained the five points of their six-pointed Star of Satan: the Purse, the Press, the Peerage, Palestine, and the Proletariat, as pointed out in The International Jew. The only one whom they await is their murdering Messianic “Prince,” who will destroy us all. Maybe they thought it was G.W. Lenin or Ehud Olmert. Perhaps they even thought it would be Ariel Sharon. Then again, maybe we are still waiting. But, one thing is certain: Jews are the incarnation, solely of their own accord and own free will, of Satan.
Many Jewish ‘scholars’ have attempted to apply this ‘deception’ to Hitler and his National Socialists, and just look at how many they have deceived. They mean to say that the system we have now is godly, but that Hitler’s system was not? I am taken aback at the thought that anyone could actually believe this “undigested porridge” when so many are enslaved, deprived, and dying.
If we are to take both Hitler and Luther at their word, as well as myriad others throughout history, then we would begin to see how Christ’s teachings were subtly altered, Judaized, watered-down, and thus, completely undermined by Rabbi Schaul and his ‘cronies’. All other religions and philosophies in the world, especially Judaism, actively promote and protect the survival of their adherents, with the one exception being Christianity. If Christianity dissipates, suffice it to say that there is no God and that the whole of Western identity, as well as Jesus’ life and sacrifice, are lies. But I doubt that Islam will take such a self-implicating and suicidal stance, and we may well be wearing burkas in the near future if this is what is to come. I would rather wear the burka and live under Islam than under Jewish atheism and pedophilic smut of Satanic America. The Arabians still have something that the Jews cannot even fathom—a little thing called “honor.”
What is most striking is the idea that Jews, who despised and murdered Christ and refused to acknowledge Him, and continue to defile His name, will be accepted—if not preferable—along with Gentiles who embrace and love Christ, and don him their Savior. This, to me, sounds like the devilry that it is. For Christ even said to the Jews, “You are the Children of the devil” and to Rabbi Peter He yelled, “Away from me Satan!” I will leave it up to you as to the interpretation of His clear message.
Now, Hitler’s conception of Christianity makes sense.
It might not be a bad idea to end this piece on the factual note that the murdering nation of Jewish killers—also known as ‘Israel’—exists solely upon the money and materiel being wrongfully and illegally extorted from the International States of Israel [in Lucy’s Pets We Apparently Trust!], and, ZO-Jewmany.
The illegitimate nation of Israel would not even exist without the extortionist “white-front” organizations known as, “Auschwitz” and the “Simon Wiesenthal Center,” located in Los Angeles, California. Auschwitz even has a hotel and a restaurant for tourists, nearby. Can you say, “guilt-trip”? The Jewish people have to make the non-Jewish people feel “guilty” and “evil” for committing the alleged holocaust, so that Jewish people can park their murdering selves in Arabian land—for free.
The Jews are “a Volk composed of the garbage of all other Volks” in the words of Heinrich Himmler. Everything they do and touch is garbage. They will lead America to the Kingdom of AntiChristdom, along with all the other non-Jewish nations of the world. If the sheeple are not careful, they may all end up like the Africans and Philistines—the two most broken races of peoples in this Jewish world of greed, hatred, racism, supremacism, capitalism, bolshevism, chaos, mass murder, starvation, environmental degradation and destruction, and garbage.
The Jewish people are Antichrist. This does not mean that Jews are inherently “evil,” as this is simply a term which serves to label severely malicious intent. There can be no doubt that the Jewish people on the whole is a vicious and hateful people, as they propagate physical and psychological warfare against non-Jews constantly; however, they may willingly choose to step off this hateful path any time they choose. Will they choose to assimilate into Gentile society and treat Gentiles with respect? Well, I do not think so. They have not thus far. They mass murdered Lebanese recently, for Lord only knows what reason. They instigated WWI, WWII, the Gulf War, the War on Terror, and the current Iraq War. They are all cleverly pointing the finger at Bush, Blair, and Cheney, but, they fail to realize that we see past their schemes. They will also be indicted in the coming showdown. Remember, too, that it is they who are mass murdering Palestinian Semites on a daily basis in Gaza, not Bush, Blair, or Cheney. These three are, indeed, war criminals, but the Jews with their Zionist Haifa pipeline dream are the worse for it.
If both Jewish Zionism and Liberalism do not qualify as tangible manifestations of hatred and racism, then what does? What does?!
Jewish liberals are at the forefront of pro-immigration policies which serve to disenfranchise American citizens of African, Amerindian, and European descent. These three ethnic groups, in my opinion, are the only three groups who truly have claim to this land at the present. The Vikings had arrived on America’s shores before the Amerindians. The Europeans left, the Amerindians arrived, and the European “holy-Joes” were regrettably the ones who came back. Africans were brought here forcibly. So, that being said, these three groups must learn to share this continent.
The rest of these immigrants, by and far, whom the Jews are going to use to break and kill us, have come here on a Jewish invitation—including the Jews themselves. To be real honest, I do not believe that a multiracial America is going to make it. The balkanization has already begun. Moreover, Africans are now fleeing to majority European areas to escape the Mexican-instigated genocide against them. They are welcome, so long as they do not commit crimes against European Americans. Those crimes would qualify as “hate crimes” and “race-based crimes” which are against the law. Even the Jews agree with this premise. But, notice, the Jews only care about certain racial groups? Their newest reactionaries are the Mexicans. They have dropped the African cause like a hat. The truth is that Jews hate everyone who isn’t Jewish. And even if they are anti-Zionist, they still resent Gentiles and Christians and they refuse to abide by Gentile laws. They will not assimilate, and they use their religion as their justification in this regard. So, I am now no longer an “American.”
I am a Christian of German-Slavic descent. I do not believe in this new America. America is no longer the beautiful Arian nation it once was. If Americans think for two minutes that this nation is going to revert back to its former beauty and greatness under Jewish and Mexican rule, they had better guess again. It will be a new Mexico, not America. I do not love this new America. I am not an American. I am a European, and I am proud of it. If the Jews and Mexicans are going to break away from the American identity, then so, too, shall I. I fly my native Polish and German flags now. I am learning German, not Spanish. I am boycotting all stores owned or staffed with Mexicans and Jews. They patronize their own, and so, too, shall I. If our military truly understood who and what they were fighting for, they would cringe in their boots. They might as well be fighting under the Mexican or Jewish flag at this point in time. Those are the only people who are going to benefit from this bloodbath in Iraq. The Jewish leaders will pass the “Dream Act” and European Americans will all end up paying for these migrants to go to schools and colleges in America. They will also pay for their own tuition. So, they will pay for two college educations. They will also have no retirement or pension funds and they will have to pay back the $500 billion that Bush II has racked up. What a future! I can hardly wait!
The Jews willingly elect to wear all the crowns of blaspheme and they revile the name of the Christ in their filthy, pornographic, incestuous, Talmud. Perhaps it’s time to declare an all-out economic war on the Jewish people, just as they had done to the German people in 1933 and 1938—even though there was absolutely no provocation for such an action by the German people or leadership.
|