|
Hitler: On Christianity
Emma’s comments in brackets
Hitler on Christianity
“I know that here and there the objection has been raised: Yes, but you have deserted Christianity. No, it is not that we have deserted Christianity; it is those who came before us who deserted Christianity. We have only carried through a clear division between politics, which have to do with terrestrial things, and religion, which must concern itself with the celestial sphere. There has been no interference with the doctrine of the Confessions or with their religious freedom, nor will there be any such interference. On the contrary the State protects religion, though always on the one condition that religion will not be used as a cover for political ends.
Jewish-Bolshevist Communist Crimes
[Czar] Nicholas and his family are only the best known of countless victims of a regime that openly proclaimed its ruthless purpose. [Also, see The Last Days of the Romanovs for more on Jewish-led mass murder atrocities against the ethnic Russian leadership.] A few weeks after the Ekaterinburg massacre, the newspaper of the fledgling Red Army declared:
“Without mercy, without sparing, we will kill our enemies by the scores of hundreds, let them be thousands, let them drown themselves in their own blood. For the blood of Lenin and Uritskii let there be floods of blood of the bourgeoisie—more blood, as much as possible.” [Need I even expound upon this hideousness?]
Grigori Zinoviev [Jew], speaking at a meeting of Communists in September 1918, effectively pronounced a death sentence on ten million human beings:
“We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of Soviet Russia's inhabitants. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated.”
- Excerpted from Mark Weber’s The Jewish Role in the Bolshevik Revolution and Russia's Early Soviet Regime
Hitler on Luther and the Church
I believe this quote from Hitler serves as a good example of his thinking with regard to the Church:
“[On Martin Luther] His predilection of many years toward the Jews is a bit misleading; one must take into account a certain naiveté, a lack of worldliness, the result of his stay in the cloister…Nevertheless Luther was a great man, a giant [allusion to Nordic giants]. With a shock which pierced the twilight [epiphany] he saw the Jews as we have only begun to see them today. But, unfortunately, too late, and even then not there, where he had done the most damage [inadvertently] – in Christianity. Oh, had he only seen them there; had he only seen them in his youth! Then he would not have attacked Catholicism, but, rather, the Jews behind it! Instead of a wholesale condemnation of the Church, he would have let his whole, passionate impetus fall on the true villains. Instead of glorifying the Old Testament [Jewish doctrine], he would have branded it as the arsenal of the Antichrist…would never have come to the splitting of the Church or to the war which, in accordance with the wishes of the Hebrews [Jews], spilled Aryan blood in torrents for thirty long years.”
- Excerpt from Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin: A Conversation between Adolf Hitler and Me
And Do Not Forget Context...
It is extremely important to take into account the anti-Semitic tone and the many atheistic ideologies of Enlightened and Romantic Europe, especially during Hitler’s own lifetime, to really be able to understand why and how he came to his beliefs and feelings—with regards to both Christianity and Jewry—in the way that he did. It does not seem out-of-line or unjustified when one considers all the evidence within this anti-Semitic and anti-Christian context. Dr. Birken addresses these very ideas in his book Hitler as Philosophe.
Moreover, Hitler was no less justified in his persecution of Jewry, especially in light of the heinous and unforgivable Jewish-led crimes in Soviet Russia and Ukraine, than the medieval crusaders who persecuted Muslims in an effort to ‘reclaim’ their Holy Land. In addition, Hitler was no less justified in his persecution of Jewry, than Jewry’s persecution of Arab peoples today. Every people and nation-state acts in its own self-interest, and for anyone to expect Israelis and/or Jews not to abide by this same necessarily “natural human instinct,” is to adhere to an agenda riddled with bigotry. The problem is that Jewry accepts no compromises or critique, whereas it forces compromise, and unleashes relentless and audacious critique, when they [non-Jews] act in their own self-interest, especially when it is at the ‘expense’ or perceived expense, of Jewry. Hitler’s forced removal of Jewry from the Third Reich is one example among many.
Hitler and Nietzsche on Jewry
“His comic papers especially strive to represent the Jews as a harmless little people…And the constant effort is to make him seem almost more ‘insignificant’ than dangerous. He poisons the blood of others, but preserves his own. The Jew almost never marries a Christian woman; it is the Christian who marries the Jewess…In order to mask his activity and lull his victims, however, he talks more and more of the equality of all men without regard to race and color. The fools begin to believe him.” - Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf
“The ‘masters’ have been done away with; the morality of the vulgar man [slave morality of the Jew] has triumphed. This triumph may also be called a blood-poisoning…Everything is obviously becoming Judaised, or Christianized, or vulgarized…” - Friedrich Nietzsche in The Genealogy of Morals, 9.
Hitler on the Importance of Religion
“The attack against dogmas as such, therefore, strongly resembles the struggle against the general legal foundations of a state, and, as the latter would end in a total anarchy of state, the former would end in a worthless religious nihilism.” - Adolf Hitler in Mein Kampf.
This excerpt [above] basically asserts the notion that Hitler felt that dogma was to religion as legal foundations were to the state. He realized the importance of religion, in absolute terms, especially in light of the crimes of the “godless Bolsheviks” in the East. He never once denounces the Creator or Christ in his testament. In fact, in many of his speeches and in his book, he makes it quite clear that the Jews are “the godless race” and thus, had to be removed from the Aryan world for the sake of Aryan, as well as their own, survival.
Hitler’s Reaction to Jews and Germany’s Social Ills and What It Means for America Today: A Short Essay
Hitler acted out of love for his nation and his people, unlike the neo-Nazi thugs of today who act out of hate and completely misconstrue Hitler’s National Socialism to their own twisted agenda of racism and hatred. Hitler’s German National Socialist movement consisted of highly educated members of society, as well as people who were motivated by love, and subsequently desired a national resurrection, as well as a necessarily Germanic conception of Christianity, like that inspired by Luther. I really do think that Irving is right when he asserts that Hitler oftentimes had to “put the brakes” on the activities of many government officials. Evidence overwhelmingly portrays him as the mediator much more often than the instigator.
Hitler and his National Socialists were not racists… they were racialists who desired a healthy and happy nation of Germans. Their country is Germany, so why is it that Germans were, and still are, expected to allow an unbridled influx of non-Germans to erase their nation’s identity? Hitler had to experience the bitter realities of Jewish politics and capitalism, as well as ‘multiculturalism’ (especially while in Vienna), and needless to say he did not like it. Who can possibly blame him for that? See Robert Payne’s The Life and Death of AH.
The Jews nearly annihilated the German people after the First World War, as millions of Germans starved to death and lulled in despair while the Jews carried on their inhuman inflation against the entire nation. Not only that, ethnic strife was rampant, especially in Austria. America is starting to reap the same bitter fruit that Hitler and Germany were forced to consume upon the Jewish instigated inflation against them. The Mark plummeted, and so too shall the dollar. More and more Americans are losing their homes and their well-paid jobs. College students cannot find work aside from being a barista at Starbucks [a Jewish company by the way.] White men have been rendered ‘worthless’ in this country, as they are forced to have to apologize for everything and anything they think, feel, and do. They have to bear the brunt of the alleged ‘crimes’ against all the other pure and innocent people of all the other countries in the world, because one never knows when they might ‘pull a Hitler’. This is laughable at best. That is exactly what this country needs… a man who loves his people and ushers in a resurrection of Americanism.
This nation has a very bleak future if it continues on this path of destruction. Americans do not have enough money to save for their rather insecure future. Americans are paying exorbitant prices for outdated forms of energy [petrol] while the fat-cat oil companies sit back and collect the billions for their overtly comfortable retirement. None of our companies are really making an honest effort to find alternative sources of energy and transportation, so I suppose we will soon pay $5.00 or $6.00 per gallon… whatever it takes to finally wake the lazy insolent Americans from their weak-willed slumber.
Hitler was able to pull off a bloodless revolution and national resurrection. He rebuilt a decimated economy almost literally from scratch. He rebuilt a self sufficient people and imparted unto them a living Christian faith that was both rational and believable, yet did not undermine or alter true Christian teachings and faith. He imparted his immense love unto his people, so that they would be as in love with him as he was with them. He built new roads and brought new, advanced technology to his people. He managed to quell the strife amongst the classes by imbuing each class with unique privileges and values that they had not previously known to be possible. He allowed the best of the German minds to create freely and assured their education accordingly, but never devalued or marginalized the Germans who were not as intelligent or as gifted.
Hitler allowed Germans the choice as to whether or not they wished to allow their severely mentally or physically disabled children to live in this manner. This is certainly no different than the case of Terry Schiavo. There will always be people who believe that it is not okay to determine whether or not a person should live or cease to live under these circumstances, but the fact of the matter is, German parents had a choice. He implemented forced sterilization of people who might otherwise ruin the lives of their children. What child deserves to have a mentally impaired parent who cannot take care of them properly and give them the life they deserve? What child deserves to have to live with cystic fibrosis if it could have been avoided?
Now, I do think that it is important that I mention that isolated atrocities, some on a somewhat massive scale, were carried out against the mentally and physically impaired by many different groups and/or individual members of the SS. But to act as though Hitler had deliberately ordered these atrocities, or even knowingly condoned them without concrete evidence, is not right. David Irving goes into some detail in this regard in Hitler’s War. Sebastian Haffner also addresses this in The Meaning of Hitler, but fails to give good solid evidence to support his position. See his chapter on ‘Hitler’s Crimes’.
Millions of healthy children are murdered (via abortion) by their own mothers in this country, and were murdered back then as well, yet we tend to act as though this is okay, but sterilization is not. The death penalty is okay, but certain cases of euthanasia for the extremely disabled are not. I do not know about you, but I would never want to live as a cripple and be fed via a plastic tube. I feel sorry for people who insist that human beings have to live like this and have no say whatsoever about it.
Many people express hatred for Hitler for his ‘less than popular’ policies regarding eugenics and sterilization, but before you make a judgment about him in this regard, consider first his motivations.
Hitler had a lot of retardation and physical maladies in his family. He lost his brother when he was still very young and according to Robert Payne in The Life and Death of Adolf Hitler, he used to gaze at his brother’s grave from the graveyard wall and he would fall asleep there at times. He lost his father when he was young. He lost his mother to breast cancer when he was young. He had mentally disabled cousins and distant relatives. Back in Hitler’s day, this was considered a source of embarrassment and shame. Hitler himself had a bad heart and extreme stomach pain for the good latter half of his life. He also probably developed Parkinson’s Disease. My father has this disease and he has terrible nightmares quite frequently, as well as fits of rage. He shuffles terribly bad, he’s hunched over, and he is always exhausted. I can only imagine this kind of burden that Hitler underwent physically and neurologically as he continued to conduct the war in its final year. Suffice it to say, that he may also have experienced senility towards the end, which certainly would explain his inability to accept the realities occurring on the battlefield. I do not want to stray too much, so I will get back to my point with all this.
Hitler did not want his people to have to experience the same bitterness he had experienced… so much loss, pain, and heartache. He wanted his people to be as fit and healthy as humanly possible, so that they would not have to suffer mentally or physically. He wanted his people to work as a whole at becoming a healthy people, so that they would not have to experience the unnecessary sorrow of living as a mentally or physically retarded individual, or knowing someone else who had to live this way. Let us face reality here, the mentally and physically disabled are not treated well at all in any society. The children are ridiculed relentlessly by peers, they have a very hard time making friends, they are treated as a burden on society, most people do not want to work with them or help them, and oftentimes they are abused or neglected. Is this any kind of a life if it could have been avoided much earlier on? I will leave this up for contemplation, but I can honestly say that I would not choose life if it was me.
Moving on to lighter things, Hitler made sure that breast cancer was fought and also that smoking was at least relentlessly attacked and quelled. He wanted to institute prohibition, but Ludecke (I Knew Hitler) informed him that that was not at all a feasible idea. Needless to say, Hitler was disappointed about this. He made sure that families were taken care of, no matter their social status, and as a result, was able to successfully combat social ills like prostitution and alcoholism.
Hitler made certain that everyone had a house and a car, no matter their income or status. The poor were given beautiful little countryside cottages with a plot for the children and a small garden. He helped invent the Volkswagen, as well as its affordable payment plan, so that even the poor could have a beautiful new car. This in turn instilled a renewed sense of value and worth of even the poorest Germans, hence they worked very hard in return. When your government appreciates you and gives to you, you tend to want to give back and work harder. When people know that they are valued and appreciated, they work hard and do not begrudge paying taxes. These are all lessons of which America should certainly take notice.
No single person can make the world better, but as Hitler had told Wagener, “You must continue to reach ever higher, and then higher yet.”
|